• 1 Replies

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Offline the leveller

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • 4128
  • +75/-0
« on: June 13, 2013, 10:30:50 PM »


by Rodney Atkinson

Those who attended the 1993 Bilderberg meeting in Greece included three Britons - Kenneth Clarke, Tony Blair and Sir Patrick Sheehy (the then Chairman of BAT, the same post later occupied by Kenneth Clarke) who within a few weeks of each other in early 1995 all wrote articles in British newspapers in support of the abolition of the Pound and of the Bank of England as a central bank - i.e. in favour of a European Single Currency.
This is adapted from chapter 7 of my book Europe's Full Circle published in 1997. I reproduce it here on the occasion of the 2013 meeting of Bilderberg in the United Kingdom, to which a number of Government figures including George Osborne and David Cameron were invited. There is no shortage of the wilder type of conspiracy theorist available on the web. The BBC has cleverly just interviewed one of the wilder elements on the Andrew Neill chaired Politics Today current affairs programme, but there is a very calm and analytical case to be put about the rise of anti democratic corporatism through organisations like Bilderberg and its ultimate expression - the European Union and I hope I put that case here. But I doubt whether the BBC will want a credible and rational exposure of Bilderberg!

Between 1973, when Edward Heath's European Communities Act came into force and today legislation has passed through the House of Commons which has effectively destroyed the United Kingdom, its democracy, the jurisdiction of its courts and the sovereignty of its parliament. Such an enterprise did not happen without deliberate intent, secrecy and the active collaboration of leading British politicians and businessmen. It could also not have happened unless it had been:

1. In the interests of a powerful force (certain political and corporate interests in the United States bent on creating a United States of Europe)
2. Based on a well thought out scheme (the historical German and French plans for a corporatist Eurostate)
3. Implemented by undemocratic means (powers which allowed the executive to bypass Parliament); and
4. Supported by a clique of British establishment figures who have claimed that, since the Empire became a Commonwealth, the United Kingdom was finished and its political and economic influence of no account. Echoing similar attitudes in 1914 and 1939 they so appeased the demands of our adversaries that they failed to protect either our national interest or even our constitution.

There is a secretive group which, in its foundation and in its core (if not in all those who have attended its meetings) has played a central role in this process - the Bilderberg Group, founded in 1954 by Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands.

Bernhard was a Nazi party member from 1933 until 1937 who resigned one day after his controversial marriage to the future Queen of the Netherlands. The timing of his resignation letter (in order to marry into the Dutch royal family) tells us more than his later apparent support for the Allied cause. An unsigned copy of Prince Bernhard's resignation letter was found in the National Archives, Washington (see Appendix I). The letter ended "Heil Hitler" - hardly a renunciation of the Nazi party. In 1934 he was the subject of a report by a US Congress committee which identified him as an SS officer attached to the Nazi government's principal industrial ally, I G Farben.

He resigned from Bilderberg in 1976, the year in which he was revealed by the Dutch Government's Donner Commission as having accepted a US$lm bribe from the Lockheed Corporation. (Not dissimilar to the resignation of Conrad Black from Bilderberg before being imprisoned for corporatist corruption!) As reported in the Times of 10th and the 12th June 1976, one of the witnesses, on his way to the Commission with tapes and documents, was run over by a car and his briefcase stolen. That witness was a British zoologist, Tom Ravensdale, former PR officer with the World Wildlife Fund of which Prince Bernhard was president.

The origins of this secretive international group of businessmen, principally corporatist and socialist politicians, journalists (who conveniently forget their devotion to open democratic discussion when invited by Bilderberg) and a few misguided continental royals, lie in post-Second-World-War American-European relations.

Bilderberg apparently represents and attracts the kind of people who regard corporatist and state power as more "efficient" than the wishes of individuals, families and nations. The former American ambassador to Bonn, George McGhee, is on record as saying that, "The Treaty of Rome which brought the European Community into being was nurtured at Bilderberg meetings". (McGhee was in fact my father's tutor at Oxford in the late 1930s)

Richard Aldrich, a former CIA operative, wrote in Diplomacy and Statecraft, March 1997:

"Although Bilderberg and the European Movement shared the same founders, members and objectives arguably Bilderberg constituted the more effective is clear that the Rome Treaty was nurtured at Bilderberg in the proceeding year."

Aldrich further asserts (and he should know) that the American Committee for a United Europe which shared so many "founders, members and objectives" with Bilderberg:

"...reveals the style of early covert actions, not least the reliance on private organisations - albeit coordinated by a close circle of friends"

The minutes of the first Bilderberg meeting declared their aim:

"... to evolve an international order which would look beyond the present day crisis. When the time is ripe our present concepts of world affairs should be extended to the whole world."

The key phrases, indeed code words for this self-appointed elite, include "international order" - a phrase common to both naive modern-day corporatists and the pernicious leaders of Nazi Germany. "When the time is ripe" indicates both the long-term planning of their project ("our present concepts") and an element of secrecy. The phrase "the whole world" reveals their supranational power cravings and the intention to eliminate untidy elements like national democracies.

Virtually all the leading Bilderberg figures are also members of the US-based Council on Foreign Relations which (despite the presence of many sound liberal and conservative inter-nationalists) was founded by the most fanatical of all "world government" proponents, Paul Warburg. Warburg's activities included being a director of IG Farben America which, during the Second World War, entered into technology transfer agreements with the Rockefellers' Standard Oil as well as benefiting from Standard Oil's monopoly in synthetic rubber which greatly enhanced Nazi Germany's foreign exchange earnings and its capacity to manufacture war materials. Iso-octane technology, essential for German aviation fuel was provided exclusively by Rockefeller's Standard Oil of New Jersey.

It was Paul Warburg's son James who, in evidence to a US Senate committee in 1950, best articulated the aims of the world collectivists:

"We shall have world government whether we like it or not The only question is whether World government will be achieved by conquest or consent."

So the principal European pillar of the Bilderberg group was a once well connected Nazi while the American pillar was a Rockefeller whose family company, Standard Oil, had been so helpful to the Nazi regime and had a joint venture from the 1920s to 1942 with the Nazis' principal industrial ally (IG Farben).

James Stewart Martin, the former chief of the Economic Warfare Section of the Department of Justice, noted in his 1950 book "All Honourable Men":

"a picture began to emerge of an enemy that did not need the services of spies and saboteurs. By agreement between German and American producers of magnesium (needed for aircraft) production in the United States before the war was limited to no more than 5,000 tons per year. In contrast, Germany in 1939 alone used 13,500 tons and during the next five years consumed magnesium at the rate of 33,000 tons per year."

Reuters reported (5.10.96) on recently declassified American Intelligence documents which confirmed an August 1944 meeting between the SS and representatives of 7 German companies including Krupp, Rochling, Messerschmidt and Volkswagen. At this meeting in Strasbourg plans were made to build up wealth, power and industrial capacity abroad, "so that a strong German empire can be created after the defeat". A US Treasury Department analysis of 1946 reported that the Germans had transferred $500m out of the country before the end of the war.

The aim was to prepare "for a post war commercial campaign" in other words the very kind of political-industrial planning which this book describes as "corporatist". German companies were encouraged to make alliances with foreign companies and the SS referred to the kind of international patent sharing agreements which Krupp made with US companies - and of which the above mentioned IG Farben-Standard Oil agreement was a classic example.

What politicians forget today is that in the late 1940s and early 1950s, before the Soviet Communist invasion of Hungary and the construction of the Berlin Wall, Germany was pursuing the same nationalistic (i.e. aggressive national) aims as in the 1930s but using the "building of Europe" as the means to this end. The links between Nazi Germany's Europe and Hitler's "world order" and today's crisis in Europe and the "New World Order" lie in this post-war period. This should not be surprising since 134 of von Ribbentrop's Foreign Office civil servants served under Adenauer and the same man appointed by Hitler as secretary of his "Europe Committee" (Heinz Twetschler von Falkenstein) was chosen by Adenauer in 1949 for a similar job as Director of the "European Division" of the West German Foreign Office. Consider the common theme in these three quotations from 1931, 1950 and 1951. First Dr Duisberg of IG Farben in 1931:

"Only an integrated trading block will enable Europe to gain innermost economic strength ... the longing for a thousand year Reich cries for a new approach. For such a purpose we can use the mirage of a pan Europe."

(From 1934 onwards IG Farben became the principal industrial vehicle for Hitler's war preparations.) Notice here what modern German leaders suppress but which the Nazis did not disguise - that for many Germans "Europe" and "das Reich" are one and the same.

Konrad Adenauer himself (the German founder of the European Community and indeed of modern Germany) said in 1950:

"A federated Europe will be a third force ... Germany has again become a factor with which others will have to reckon ... If we Europeans colonise Africa we create at the same time a supplier of raw materials for Europe."

Even for Adenauer therefore "Europe" was a grand imperial ambition rather than just a national interest. And from 1951, Adenauer's Minister of Commerce, Dr Seebohm (anticipating the British Government's favourite phrase "Britain at the heart of Europe"!):'Does free Europe want to join Germany? Germany is the heart of Europe and the limbs must adjust themselves to the heart not the heart to the limbs."

So some of the more naive cold war policies of the USA and the activities of Bilderberg have brought about the aims of aggressive German nationalism but have done so in the name of a "new international order" - and, of course, corporatism. The same names (Ford and Rockefeller) whose companies had US directors on the board of American IG Farben (which used its funds to finance Nazi propaganda and three of whose German directors were found guilty at Nuremburg) also part-financed both the major "new world order", corporatist institutions established after the First World War (the Council on Foreign Relations and the London based Royal Institute of International Affairs). Henry Ford (personally on the board of American I.G.) wrote The International Jew, a favourite book of Hitler whose activities Ford financed in the 1920s. In 1938 Ford received Germany's highest medal for non-Germans - the Grand Cross of the German Eagle.

The supranational/collectivist and anti-nation attitude of the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London is best demonstrated by Professor Arnold Toynbee (Director of Studies at that institute) at the Fourth Annual Conference for the Scientific Study of International Relations in 1931 when he presented his paper "Prophecy in the Twentieth Century":

"If we are honest with ourselves we shall admit that we are engaged on a deliberate, sustained and concentrated effort to impose limitations upon the sovereignty and independence of the sovereign independent states which at present... divide the political allegiance of mankind."

It is of course not so much "dividing" the allegiance that worries these "world government" elitists but the fact that they themselves cannot attract such allegiance. The duplicitous Toynbee continues:

"And all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty or the local national states of the world is still a heresy for which statesman or a publicist can be ostracised and discredited."

Observers of incompetent and treasonous foreign policies pursued by British governments will not be surprised to hear that Toynbee had important intelligence and research posts in the British Foreign Office in both world wars.

But it was following the Second World War that the Polish-born Dr Josef Retinger, who had long intrigued to establish a Eurostate, set up the European Movement and with American CIA funds, the "American Committee on a United Europe" -the latter funding the former. Retinger interested (the native-German) Prince Bemhard of the Netherlands (see Appendix I for details of his Nazi Party membership) in his schemes and it was Bernhard who set up the Bilderberg Group named after the Hotel in Oosterbeek in Holland where the first meeting was held on 29-31st May 1954.
The early post-war CIA recruited many idealistic young veterans of the Pacific and European struggles. They sought to counter communism with an anti-Soviet conglomerate of European states. Even as late as 1975, by which time many of these were in senior positions there was pressure from the CIA for a "United States of Europe". As Vice-Chairman of the "No Campaign" in the 1975 UK referendum on European Community membership, Sir Richard Body MP was approached by two CIA officials who were unhappy about the anti-British and pro-European Community propaganda which the London CIA office had been told to disseminate. The then head of station in London was a certain Cord Meyer Junior who in 1954 was responsible for the funding of the European Youth Campaign. The campaign (for "European Unity") was the most active part of the European Movement between 1951 and 1959, not least because thanks to Meyer and others the CIA funded it to the tune of ?1.34m. Needless to say no leading British newspaper published Sir Richard Body's evidence but a piece did appear in Time Out! Like the BBC today any serious analysis of anti democratic corporatism is condemned to the entertainment sphere!

Can the Bilderberg Group be described as a "conspiracy"? The core "Europhiles" who comprise the steering committee seem to be bent on a strategy which they conceal from voters and for which they have no democratic mandate - these few may perhaps be described at the very least as anti-democratic. Some attendees are just natural corporatists and socialists eager to attack national democracies while others attend because they are impressed by finding themselves part of a conclave of the "famous". For the sake of appearances other guests are invited, who totally reject their "one world" or even "one Europe" philosophy (Enoch Powell, Norman Lamont and Margaret Thatcher for example each attended only once).

But in general they are a group of the kind of people who believe in collectivist policies within nation states, the "organisation" of capital and labour by superior brains (like their own) and who, failing to convince voters at home, gravitate to the supra-national collectivism of larger and therefore more distant and less democratically accountable power bases. No wonder Margaret Thatcher (whose downfall was reportedly discussed and anticipated with such prescience at the 1989 Bilderberg conference)said, "It is an honour to be criticised by the Bilderberg Group".

Bilderberg has always discussed and promoted its power politics and designs behind closed doors. It has invited journalists of repute who never report their activities, and it invites leading politicians not as individuals but because they enjoy or are likely soon to enjoy positions of power. Both Heath and Blair were invited before they became leaders of their parties.

Bilderberg contends that individuals are invited for discussions, not men of power to decide or follow an agenda. But their meetings are shrouded in secrecy and are policed often by the armed forces of the countries in which they meet. Special security measures are taken, official cars meet leading participants at airports, special telephone and other communication links are provided direct to government and corporate headquarters. Only participants are allowed in the hotels they take over, delegates arrive anonymously, no agenda for the meetings are published and no delegate lists or communiques are issued.

David Rockefeller expressed his gratitude to the "free press" of the democratic nations for their silence when he addressed a secretive reunion of Bilderberg in Sand, Germany in June 1991. The following is a translation from the French journal "Minute" of June 19th 1991. "We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our re-union and have respected their promises of discretion for almost four decades."

The definition of a "great publication" is evidently one which publishes nothing of great significance. It is certainly one which realises that the "freedom of the press" is not the freedom of the people and the right to know is a right of governments, not of the governed. Rockefeller continued:

"It would not have been possible to develop our world project if we bad been subjected to the full fire of publicity all these years. But the world is now more sophisticated and disposed to move towards a world government which will not know war but only peace and prosperity for all mankind."

Those who meet behind closed doors, plotting the end of nation states, defying democracy and emphasising the elite nature of their group and the inadequacy of everyone else - such people are of course outraged if the democratic will does not fall in with their schemes. They also believe that their skills are precisely those which are indispensable to a governing elite. The banker Rockefeller therefore naturally asserts:

"The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and of world bankers is surely preferable to the self-determination which has been practised for centuries past."

It is of course just because they fear that the world will reject their ideas that the Bilderberg elite meet in secret, seeking to establish their fantastic "new world" before the people can wake up and prevent its realisation. Those attending are often financed out of Bilderberg funds and some are asked by their governments to attend officially (confirmed by Dr David Owen and Tony Blair), thus disproving the Bilderberg claim that everyone attends as a "private individual". Some have rather hazy memories about who paid for what and fail to enter their paid-for trips in the parliamentary register of members interests. Kenneth Clarke, like most politicians attending these meetings, claims complete ignorance of the background of the founder of Bilderberg. Many will wish to know why those who owe their positions to national electorates should attend (at the expense of taxpayers or a secret group) meetings of an organisation founded by a former Nazi party member and SS officer, to pursue a secret agenda with leading international businessmen and selected members of the press committed to secrecy which, as we have seen in the "European Union", can have serious consequences for their own unconsulted electorates. Every MP is elected openly on a manifesto, democratically debated, to sit in his national parliament to make decisions solely in the interests of his own national electorate. Attending secret meetings of groups with a covert agenda, most of whose members were never elected, in well guarded locations is not at all what their voters had in mind.

The book Treason at Maastricht (Atkinson McWhirter 1994 see lists those who attended the 1993 Bilderberg meeting in Greece. They included three Britons - Kenneth Clarke, Tony Blair and Sir Patrick Sheehy (the then Chairman of BAT, the same post later occupied by Kenneth Clarke!) who within a few weeks of each other in early 1995 all wrote articles in British newspapers in support of the abolition of the Pound and of the Bank of England as a central bank - i.e. in favour of a European Single Currency. In 1995 and 1996 a new British name started to appear on the Bilderberg list of guests - John Monks, the President of the Trade Union Congress. A leading trade unionist fits Bilderberg's corporatist politics. Like corporate executives, civil servants and politicians, trade unionists believe in "organising" capital, labour, prices, parliaments and ultimately, of course, nations. Monks is now also advocating the abolition of the Pound.

And today in 2013 as the economic and democratic results of their ideas bear their poisoned fruit for all to see Bilderberg meets again - in Britain.


the watcher

  • Guest
The most powerful private club in the world
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2014, 05:14:55 PM »

Bilderberg's silent takeover of Britain’s $60bn defense budget

see this as well if you have time
A Bridge Not Far, Monty's Operation Market Garden sabotaged? 

 Beginning his working life in the aviation industry and trained by the BBC, Tony Gosling is a British land rights activist, historian & investigative radio journalist.
Get short URL
 Published time: May 16, 2014 10:23

 A British Lynx 2 helicopter.(AFP Photo)

 Democracy had another near-fatal stroke, and the military industrial complex further tightened UK defense spending with the appointment of ex-army officer and Tory hothead Rory Stewart MP as the new chairman of Westminster’s Defence Select Committee.

 Last week the Home Affairs Select Committee delivered a damning verdict on Britain's defense and secret service oversight, on taxpayer accountability. It said the refusal of the director general of MI5, Andrew Parker, to appear before them and lack of any effective supervision was "undermining the credibility of the intelligence agencies and parliament itself."

Surely nothing could surpass the ‘Dodgy Dossier', the criminal conspiracy that led to the US and Britain, as the Arab League put it in 2003, to 'Opening the Gates of Hell in Iraq'? But with Stuart's appointment to oversee public scrutiny of UK military spending just two weeks before NATO's political cabal of which he's a member, the Bilderberg conference, meets in Copenhagen later this month, it is clear to those who still have eyes to see that those bloody lessons have not been learned and the worse could be yet to come.

The most powerful private club in the world

 In their Christmas 1987 edition, The Economist described Bilderberg as ‘Ne Plus Ultra’ the most powerful private club in the world. Its power has certainly not diminished as the decades have rolled by and neither has its secrecy. Although it began with trades unionists and powerful people it wanted to persuade, in its final days Bilderberg has boiled down to a rotten core of bankers, royalty, arms industry, oil and media barons and Rory Stuart MP, in the tradition of Kissinger, Blair, Cameron, Osborne and Balls, has thrown his lot in with them.

 In 1943, half way through the war, the US power elite saw that, barring any big surprises, Hitler was going to lose World War Two, so their ‘War And Peace Studies Group’ of the Council On Foreign Relations (CFR) quietly began to prepare the Marshall Plan for the post-war world. Alongside the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), a sizable budget was set aside to fund a range of activities which would ensure Europeans didn't vote communist and were welded economically, culturally and politically to the US for the foreseeable future.


 British soldier Lieutenant-Colonel Nick Lock (C) checks his equipment before conducting a patrol with soldiers of the 1st Batallion of the Royal Welsh in streets of Showal in Nad-e-Ali district, Southern Afghanistan, in Helmand Province.(AFP Photo / Thomas Coex )

Born in a Nazi ‘witches cauldron’ of British blood

 Bilderberg's first chairman, Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, was born into the German aristocracy. He joined the Nazi party at university, then the SS but he married into the Dutch royal family, dropping the silver deaths-head and black SS uniform before the war. His newly adopted Holland was invaded by his old Nazi friends in 1941, so he fled to Britain with Dutch Queen Wilhelmina and his wife, Princess Juliana.

 As a former SS officer he was scrutinized by the Admiralty's wartime spymaster, Ian Fleming who, after a year of watching Bernhard, signed him to the British army as a trusted Dutch liaison officer.

 With 1944 came one of Bernhard’s most important jobs: to supervise the Dutch underground in the run-up to September's liberation of large parts of Holland. Field Marshall Montgomery’s audacious airborne operation, the biggest in history, depicted in Cornelius Ryan’s 1977 film A Bridge Too Far, was codenamed 'Market Garden' and intended to end the war by Christmas.

 As liaison officer for the coming Arnhem deliverance, Bernhard sent in Dutch spy, Christiaan Lindemans, codename 'King Kong', ten days beforehand to prepare resistance fighters for the allies lunge through Eindhoven, Nijmegen and over the Rhein into Arnhem.

 But instead of making contact with the Dutch underground, Bernhard’s 'King Kong' found some German soldiers and demanded to be taken straight to the Abwehr, German military intelligence. The allies’ plans for the airborne assault were in enemy hands because Bernhard’s precious Lindemans was a double agent. He had wrecked the allies’ all-important element of surprise.

‘King Kong’ was arrested and quizzed after the war by the British but never got a chance to tell his story because, under Dutch orders, he was whisked off to Germany and died in suspicious circumstances.

 Operation Market Garden went ahead on Sunday September 17, 1944, but the British paratroopers at Arnhem were quickly split and surrounded by forces containing self-propelled guns, tanks and crack SS troops, who happened to be resting nearby. Frost's 2nd battalion held on to the bridge leaving the rest of the 1st Airborne Division surrounded in what the Nazis called the Hexenkessel or 'witches cauldron', pinned down in the suburb of Oosterbeek.

 On Wednesday 20 September, 1944, as British airborne Colonel John Frost’s remaining paratroopers were being mauled by SS Panzers at Arnhem Bridge, the tanks of the Grenadier Guards, along with US paratroopers, were tantalizingly close, destroying the last German defenses down the road in Nijmegen. Ironically, it was a young captain, who was also to chair the Bilderberg meetings in later life, Lord Peter Carrington, who was leading the Grenadier battle group of Sherman tanks as they took the penultimate bridge. At 8 o'clock that evening, he was just a 20-minute drive from reinforcing Frost at the Arnhem Bridge, and victory.

 But although they still had eight hours or so before Arnhem Bridge would finally fall into German hands, Carrington’s force, along with the Irish guards, of a hundred or so tanks inexplicably stopped, just over the Nijmegen Bridge in the village of Lent, for an eighteen hour rest. After the war, 10 SS Panzer Division General Heinz Harmel mocked Carrington saying, “The British tanks made a mistake when they stayed in Lent. If they had carried on it would have been all over for us.”

'Colonel Frost later put the blame,' as Stuart Hills reports in 'By Tank To Normandy', 'firmly on the lack of drive by Guards Armoured,' of which Carrington's Grenadiers were the spearhead. 'Comparing their relatively light casualties with those suffered by the British 1st Airborne and US 82nd. Forty years later,' in 1984, 'he stood on the bridge at a reunion, shook his fist and roared a question into the air for the guards. 'Do you call that fighting!'

So Bilderberg’s first 1954 venue in Oosterbeek, Holland, was highly significant, being the same spot where a decade before the British army had suffered nearly 10,000 casualties in of one of the last Nazi bloodbaths of World War II. Bernhard had given the game away and when it looked like, despite his treachery, the brave allied soldiers might pull it off, Carrington and his corps of tanks ground to a halt for an eighteen hour tea break.


 AFP Photo / Dan Chung

Psychos always return to the scene of the crime

 Like the psychopath, who feels compelled to return to the scene of the crime, Prince Bernhard returned to Oosterbeek to chair the inaugural Bilderberg meeting in 1954. The conferences led to the signing of the Treaty of Rome, which started the European Economic Community (EEC) three years later.

 Surrounded by the great and good of the post war world, the prince hoped nobody would examine his reasons for choosing Oosterbeek. At the best it was an in-joke – at the worst the battle was thrown. Whatever way you look at it sixty years on, the coded message from that first Bilderberg meeting should be clear to us now. Ten years after the war, the Nazis were back.

The seventy year Bilderberg project is almost complete

 So seventy years since the Arnhem slaughter and sixty years since the first Bilderberg conference, the EEC has become the EU. NATO's new feudal oligarchy of Western banksters and multinationals own and control all the big political parties as well as almost everything that moves both sides of the Atlantic.

 Some saw it coming: former SS general Paul Hausser, who became chief of HIAG, the German SS veterans group after the war, claimed that "the foreign units of the SS were really the precursors of the NATO army." Others detailed the Nazis' transformation from military to financial empire including former CBS News correspondent Paul Manning in his 1981 book 'Martin Bormann Nazi in Exile'.

 Bilderberg’s latest wheeze is the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). This treaty makes voting pointless by letting multinationals sue governments and will leave only the thinnest veneer of democracy for the mainstream media to chew on both in Europe and America. The ‘nation states’ will become mere prefectures and the European Commission will be the unelected government of the United States of Europe.

 As ordinary people across Europe and America cry out for decent basic standards such as fresh water, food, shelter, healthcare, heating and full employment, the mainstream media barely hear them because this is not the Bilderberg way. Instead, these pinstriped fascists bury us in debt, steal our leisure time, erode quality time with children, friends and family, and then blame us for demanding a fair share of the rewards of human progress.

 The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

 At 10:05 15/05/2014, Harry Beckhough wrote:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
 From: Administrator <[email protected]>
 Date: 14 May 2014 19:01
 Subject: thEUnit Digest
 To: harry beckhough < [email protected]>

 Â    Visit our Website

ThEUnit Brand Logo

Todays Latest European Union News

[]     []  [] []   []  [] 

Video News Channels

1. European Union could investigate F1 group

 The European Union is "monitoring" the controversial new system of decision-making within Formula One, it has emerged.

 Earlier this month, we reported that F1's four smallest teams - Marussia, Caterham, Force India and Sauber - had written a letter complaining about the new and rule- influential Strategy Group.

 The Group is made up of the grid's powerful 'big five' teams and for historic reasons, Williams, who recently vetoed FIA president Jean Todt's plans for a 2015 budget cap.

 Force India Deputy, Bob Fernley, told The Guardian that the big teams also receive the lion's share of the commercial revenue distributed by Bernie Ecclestone.

 Now here's a thought, a democratic free society largely only needs a Government to handle justice and public infrastructure. A socialist state manages housing, welfare, policing and education. A fascist or statis system manages control and legislation over all aspects, essentially drawing control over everything to the state.

 Now ask yourself folks, where on this scale would you place the European Union?

 Read More


2. EU Commission's renewable energy goals 'weak'

 The EU Commission's 2030 renewable energy target is weak and more ambitious goals should be set, according to Christian Haellmigk, an energy law expert at international law firm CMS Hasche Sigle.

 Haellmigk spoke on Saturday about the European Union's 2030 energy goals and problems at the 20th International Energy and Environment Fair and Conference in Istanbul, whose main media sponsor is Anadolu Agency.

 Haellmigk said EU's climate and energy goals would be legislated by October 2014, and summarised them as "202020 Formula", which means 20 per cent reduction in greenhouse emissions, 20 per cent increase in renewable sources (RES) and energy efficiency by 2020.

 Well of course you can argue for and against this policy, but what you can be sure of, it's going to make energy more expensive.

 Read More


3. Greek repo operation could tap more than 3 Billion Euros

 An operation that would allow Greece's government to tap into sizeable cash reserves from various parts of the general government could provide more than E3 billion to state coffers, though the administration will need to explore legal avenues in order to lay its hands on the money, according to a senior EU source.

 In its fourth assessment review of the Greek economy released Friday, the European Commission said that a special form of repo operations would enable the state "to use idle resources available in other parts of general government to cover part of its financing needs," which by May 2015 are estimated at E5.5 billion.

 But the source said that even more than that amount could eventually be tapped by drawing on excess liquidity in government accounts.

 Why does this sound like an exercise in robbing Peter to pay Paul?

 Read More


4. EU army: Why it wouldn't work

 The European Union is growing ever stronger. More and more power is concentrated into the hands of unelected bureaucrats. The Eurozone crisis played into the hands of the elite and gave them an excuse to strengthen their hold on the individual countries.

 I've written about all of that before, which is why today, I would like to talk about a new, but related, topic: A common European Army and why it would be a bad idea.

 Many fans of the European Union have been open about the fact that they want the EU to establish a military force. Not in the immediate future of course, but "some time". It's the ultimate dream for eurointegrationists: To finally have a military, so that they can conduct international operations and give Kent - the hometown of Nigel Farage - the District-12 in "The-Hunger-Games" treatment it deserves.

 Of course, the last part is between the lines stuff.

 One could argue against a European Army on the basis of national sovereignty - that's certainly a valid argument and the most important reason why I oppose such an army.

 However, there is another, almost as important reason: A European Army would not work. And by that, I mean that it couldn't even fulfill the function that those supporting the army wants it to fulfill; that of an alternative world police, balancing out the military might of the United States.

 This is a top article and recommended reading. The link is below.

 Read More

5. ‘Horizon 2020' to integrate Pakistan into world economy

 Acting Ambassador of European Union (EU) Pierre Mayaudon and Federal Minister for Science and Technology Zahid Hamid on Friday agreed that the ‘Horizon 2020 Programme' will bring the EU and Pakistani communities together through research and innovation in various fields ranging from agriculture, energy, climate change to biotechnology, safety and security.

 These views were expressed at an awareness seminar on EU's Research and Innovation Programme Horizon 2020, organised jointly by NUST and EU.

 Ambassador Pierre Mayaudon stated that Horizon 2020 could enhance the integration of Pakistan in the world economy through a more diversified and high quality delivery of products and services as well as provide longer term benefits such as much needed job creation.

 Read More


Table Talk/Video Library

 Here is your reminder for the next episode of our Table Talk discussion show, which takes place tomorrow at noon, broadcasting live from our website, and of course on our YouTube Channel. It is also on Google

 Tomorrow we have a great panel of guests and we'll be discussing the question -

 "Is the EU building an Orwellian state?"

 Put this in your diary and join us tomorrow.

 Today in our Video Library we want to draw your attention to our previous Table Talk shows. Go and take a look; we think you'll like them.

Watch here

EuroCon Video Icon

The Nightly News

Get our Newsletter  Every voice counts, we need your HELP to enable us to get vital Info out to the masses.
 HELP US by forwarding this email to your friends.

 Sign up for our Newsletter  HERE

End Email Spacer

Share this topic...
In a forum
In a site/blog

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk