Mass Immigration And The New Tower Of Babel -PART2

  • 0 Replies
  • 869 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Offline the leveller

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • 4102
  • +75/-0
Mass Immigration And The New Tower Of Babel -PART2
« on: June 15, 2014, 10:08:54 PM »
Communism As Anti-Fascism



What the so called 'anti-fascists' (who act more like fascists themselves much of the time) of the 'left' don't realise is that, with their protests against anyone who speaks out about mass immigration or the many problems associated with multiculturalism, they are being used by the real fascists and are unwittingly supporting their aims. The protesters of the UAF are destined to be enslaved by the New World Order elite every bit as much as those of the EDL. A common thread with organisations such as Unite Against Fascism, Antifa, Hope Not Hate etc is that they are all funded and controlled by the left. Usually the Labour Party or Trade Union movement, both of whom are themselves are controlled by, higher, globalist forces. Interestingly the logo for the Hope Not Hate organisation is a (Luciferian) sun symbol (why use that?) which gives you some idea of who really controls it. Ironically the swastika of the Nazi's is also an ancient sun symbol. One other observation is  the name of the British newspaper published by the Communist party is the 'Morning Star'. A descriptive term often used for Lucifer.

 Searchlight is the parent organisation behind many of these off-shoots. Its founder, Gerry Gable, once ran for the Communist Party of Great Britain. It should never be forgotten that Communism and Fascism are really two sides of the same totalitarian coin. On the one side we have the national socialists and on the other the international socialists. Both are as bad as one another but for some reason, despite being responsible for many more deaths than Fascism, the Communist/left/international Socialists/Marxists seem to be often portrayed as well intentioned good guys whose hearts are in the right place but who sometimes don't quite get things right.

Divide And Rule: The UAF And The EDL


As an aside, the current 'clash' between the UAF and the EDL is a good example of 'divide and rule'. In this case though, there's probably a bit more to it. As mentioned before, the Hegelian dialectic seeks to create conflict of some sort between two polar opposites, the thesis and antithesis. The idea is that by controlling this conflict they can shape and control the outcome of it, the synthesis. This is essentially what such large numbers of muslim immigrants have been encouraged to come to this country for. The ruling elite wish to 'change' us racially, culturally and spiritually and manipulated conflict with Islam is just one of the ways they are trying to do it.




However, the conflict we see in Britain is just one front in a much larger 'dialectic' They have engineered between Islam and the West. I suspect the low level conflict we are seeing now in Britain is just a hint of what will happen should current friction in the Middle East expand into something more deadly.




I'm certainly not unaware of the true nature and history of Islam and neither, I'd add, are the real controllers of this country. The ones who have overseen the huge rise in muslim immigration in recent times. Yes we have differences, many, in many respects, irreconcilable, but it will do neither of us any good if we fall into the traps that have been intentionally laid for us. It's important we understand who our true enemy is. Only then do we have any hope of resolving those differences without the sort of violence They are only too keen to exploit.

Anti-Immigration And Multiculturalism Is Not Racism


Israel Shamir, in the same article linked to above, states:


"Mass immigration is ruinous because it squeezes the local population, and life becomes worse for everybody but the wealthiest strata. It is a simple matter of less territory per person, and that is bad. This observation calls for no racial explanations. Why then do some anti-immigration groups regurgitate racialist slogans?


It is a triumph of the Masters of Discourse [the 'perception managers' aka 'brainwashers']. They have succeeded in convincing nearly everyone that anti-immigration is racism. The anti-immigration policy makers simply accepted this silly notion. Perhaps it is easier to go along with such a subjective argument than to fight it. The most committed groups integrated the racialists, not willing to abandon their primary mission for artificial divisions. Objection to immigration is not due to 'belief in racial superiority' or to 'racial hate', it is a perfectly normal defensive reaction of the working classes (and of those members of upper strata who feel compassion and empathy for them).


Now we can better understand the nature of the self-styled ‘anti-racist’ groups: Antifa, Searchlight, Expo and similar bodies. They are storm troopers for the Predator. They crush local solidarity groups. They act as a solvent, disintegrating traditional society…. People are impressionable, and they can’t withstand a massive attack of mass media."

 He also makes an observation that those on the 'left' should consider.


"If you are told ‘you are racist’ because you object to mass immigration, respond with ‘you are uprooting poison’ [or] 'you are the Predators’ tool', or 'you are on the side of landlords and moneylenders', and it will be true."


 I'd add you are on the side, knowingly or otherwise, of the Satanists and Luciferians who wish to enslave mankind and that would be true as well. Shamir also claimed that racism is an invention created by the 'Masters of Discourse'. He added:


"... it is a tempting sin to speak ill of others"


 This is true whether it be French 'frogs', English 'rosbif', or Irish 'paddy's'. Shamir continues:


"...[but] there is a fine but clear difference between the light witty bitchiness of Oscar Wilde and spit-dropping drivel."




It is this difference that those behind the political correctness agenda purposely fail to distinguish. The creation of racism offences was one of the key recommendations of the Frankfurt School cultural Marxists that sought to undermine and destroy Western society.  They were also the source of the dogma that is political correctness which is being used to similar effect.

 Several years ago I was racially abused by a gang of Asian males. Reflecting afterwards I realised I wasn't in the least bit offended by them screaming 'white b****rd' at me. Why would being called 'white' bother me in the slightest. If anything it was the 'spit-dropping' way it was said. That is, it was the abuse itself that was the problem and the threat of violence that was implied by it. Why then should ethnic minorities be encouraged to consider that someone calling them 'black' is the very worst thing that could happen? Wouldn't we all be better off if instead we were encouraged to ignore and shrug off such comments? To encourage anyone called 'black' to think, why on earth should I be bothered about someone calling me that. The real problem arises if the 'abuse' is done in a vitriolic or threatening manner but that is true of any abuse regardless of how it is framed or who the target is. The reason that a sensible approach such as this is never considered is because the 'elite' wish to exploit racial tensions for Their own benefit so it's in Their best interests to create as much of it as possible. They want to encourage 'black' people to perpetually consider themselves as being victims and at the same time for 'white' people to assume the role of guilty oppressors.

The Truth About Communism

 As regards Communism it's worth reflecting on the words of R.E. McMaster writing in the international investment newsletter, 'The Reaper':


“The goal of international communism is not to destroy Western international debt capitalism. The goal of international communism is to enslave mankind at the behest of Western international debt capitalism.”


Researcher Anthony J. Hilder put it similarly when he said:


“Communism is not [and never was] a creation of the masses to overthrow the Banking establishment, but rather a creation of the Banking establishment to overthrow and enslave the people.”


Oswald Spengler was even more direct:

“There is no proletarian, not even a Communist movement, that has not operated in the interests of money, and for the time being permitted by money - and that without the idealists among its leaders having the slightest suspicion of the fact.”



 
Stalin in masonic 'hidden hand' pose
The 'banking establishment' certainly funded both both Communism and Fascism (particularly its Nazi offshoot) but those who think the 'banksters' are the root cause of the problems should be aware that there are undoubtedly still higher, darker forces, pulling their strings. Those forces created and controlled (and still do) Communism as the ideal antithesis to the Capitalist thesis and it is the Hegelian doctrine of controlled conflict between these two that is supposed to result in the New World Order 'synthesis'. Freemasonry certain plays an important role in Communism with many of its leaders such as Marx and Stalin being high ranking members.

 The Hegelian dialectic (controlled conflict) is widely used in the furtherance of the New World Order objective. This explains perfectly why the puppet politicians of the state are eager to label all native Britons 'whites' and are happy to squeeze as many ethnic minorities as possible into the 'black' category. We can begin to see why we have the absurd situation where the National Black Police Association, that was formerly run by an Iranian, claims that 'black' does not refer to 'skin colour' and that membership is open to all minority groups.

The Global Citizen Is The New Babylonian

 In the article 'UN and the Occult Agenda' we looked at former Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations and 'father of global education' Robert Muller. A man who, according to New Man Magazine, 1995, seeks to:


"…steer our children towards global citizenship, earth-centred beliefs, socialist values and collective mindset which is becoming a requirement for the 21st century workforce."


 Muller was the author of the World Core Curriculum which has had an extremely significant influence on the education of the world's children. In the preface to the book it says:



 
The Lucis Trust logo as a stylised rising sun
"The underlying philosophy upon which the Robert Muller School is based will be found in the teachings set forth in the books of Alice A. Bailey ...."


 Bailey was the third head of the Theosophical society whose founder was the previously mentioned Helena Blavatsky. As we discovered earlier she openly proclaimed Lucifer and Satan as being 'the god of our planet' and our 'saviour'.
 As part of her role as the head of the Theosophists she published a magazine called Lucifer. This was continued after her death by the second head of the Society, Annie Besant.

 Bailey, along with her 32nd degree freemason husband Foster, created the Lucifer publishing company to further disseminate both her own work and that of Blavatsky's. This later changed into the Lucis Trust and in addition it now also prints and disseminates UN material. It is now 'recognised by the United Nations as a Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO), and is represented at [its] regular briefing sessions.'

 This is just the 'tip of the iceberg' where occultism and the UN is concerned, but we can see that those within the UN that deem it necessary that the world has a standardised, global, educational policy for all children are heavily influenced by worshippers of Lucifer and Satan. As said earlier, the influence of Theosophy and by extension the writings of both Blavatsky and Bailey, cannot be underestimated. Not only on the United Nations and the burgeoning New Age movement but also on the wider New World Order agenda itself. In regards to this, Alice Bailey made a very revealing statement:


"The New World Order must be appropriate to a world which has passed through a destructive crisis and to a humanity which is badly shattered by the experience...  [It] must lay the foundation for a future world order which will be possible only after a time of recovery, of reconstruction, and of rebuilding."


 The 'crisis' is being fomented as we speak with its culmination likely to include a major conflict in the Middle East or worse, a worldwide economic collapse and subsequent food and fuel shortages. All steps along the way towards the new, global, Tower of Babel.

The New Human (Slave) Race

 Bailey also said:


"…the present world order (which is today largely disorder) can be so modified and changed that a new world and a new race of men can gradually come into being."


 This 'new race' is the very same 'mongrelised' humanity with the appearance of the ancient Egyptians that the Luciferian occultists such as Pike, Coudenhove and Palmer Hall spoke of. The 'new human' that is part of this 'new race' is not just characterised by the colour of its skin, it is also meant to be reprogrammed to think in a completely different way.



 
Lady GaGa makes the 'Eye of Horus (Lucifer)' symbol
It has been well documented on websites such as Pseudo Occult Media and the Vigilant Citizen that one of the ways that the Luciferian agenda is introduced to the wider public, particularly young people, is through the entertainment industry. One artist who stands out in this respect and whose songs, videos and public persona are replete with occult symbolism, is Lady GaGa. She is clearly another puppet of higher, darker, forces and some suggest a victim of the sort of mind control that is rife in the entertainment business. In her recent song 'Born This Way' she 'narrates the birth of a new race within humanity'. This idea was carried on into her 'appearance' at the 2011 Grammy awards in America where she arrived in a large egg, which it was said, she was 'incubating' before officially birthing this 'new race'. You may think this is all stuff and nonsense but if you do you underestimate the powerful effect such imagery and words have on the young minds to which they are targeted.

Why Mass Immigration Into 'White' Nations


 Many have speculated on the reasons why it's 'white' people that are, seemingly, the main targets of this genocidal policy. There are several suggestions and perhaps all of them contain some truth. Some claim that the reason 'white' people are being targetted is because of:



"... the European tradition of ordered, self-governing liberty [that] is probably part of our genetic heritage [and is] unique among the peoples of the earth ... the people of the West recognise, at least in theory, the subordination of government to individual rights."

 Others say that just as the 'white race' comprises the majority of those within the Luciferian elite so does it also contain its greatest enemy. Others appear to confirm this theory by saying that it is because we have always proved to be too rebellious and difficult to control. The history of Britain, for example, is heavily censored and controlled and if the truth was revealed then perhaps that level of resistance would be more widely known. Still more claim that, in the case of the British, it's because Christianity (perhaps more specifically true Christianity (as opposed to the counterfeit Catholic version) which to some extent could be described as Protestantism), so loathed by those who revere Satan and Lucifer, took such deep root in their hearts, minds and very souls.

 When considering that the spiritual dimension of the New World Order agenda is the most important, there may be more to this idea than it seems. As stated before, there are many who point the finger at the Vatican as being the key player behind the scenes. Indeed my own research into these matters tends to confirm this. As we've seen, these claims are given more credence by the Roman Catholic involvement in the creation of the EU.

 In some respects then, what is happening now can be seen as a continuation of the counter reformation led by the Catholic order known as the Jesuits. It's worth remembering that every one of the prominent reformers of the Reformation identified the pope as the antichrist and the Catholic church as the 'woman riding the beast', as mentioned in Biblical prophecy. Archbishop Cranmer denounced the Pope as 'Christ's enemy and antichrist'. Interestingly, in his book 'Catholicism and Fundamentalism', the Catholic apologist Karl Keating writes:

"Babylon is a code word for Rome. It is used that way six times in the last book of the Bible and in extra-biblical works such as 'Sibylling Oracles'… and Esdras."

 Researcher and lecturer Walter Veith said the following:


 
Martin Luther
 "Already I feel greater liberty in my heart;
 for at last I know that the pope is antichrist,
 and that his throne is that of Satan himself."
"The great Protestant Reformation changed the world. But forces arose almost immediately to nullify its monumental effect and to bring the world back into line with papal teachings. The Jesuits countered the gains of the Reformation movement, setting up seats of opposition in every court, seeking to undermine and corrupt the men and women who stood for Christ. Through secret societies they put into place the false teachings that blurred the lines of reason and effectively buried the Protestant movement."

 In this respect a quote from American political figure Lyndon LaRouche seems pertinent.

"I refer specifically to Philo’s commentaries on the notion of Creation in the first chapter of Genesis (verse 26), to the effect that man is distinct from and set apart from the animals and above them, by virtue of being in the image of God. Not image in the ordinary sense, but by having this power of creative reason. That notion of man as being in the image of God defines all men as spiritually equal as sovereign individual persons before the Creator and, among all right-thinking men, among each other. That does not mean that men are equal in their development, but it means they are equal in their species nature.


On the contrary side, on the opposing side, to which Gen. [Albert] Pike adhered, we have the oligarchical view, which rejects the notion of man as in the image of God, and views man as more or less inherently utterly detestable, utterly depraved by his nature [and therefore worthy of subjugation]."


I was reminded of the above and of the absurdity of placing the blame for slavery on all 'white' people, when I recently read a poem by William Wordsworth. It was entitled, 'To Thomas Clarkson on the Final Passing of the Bill for the Abolition of the Slave Trade, March 1807.' I was intrigued as to who Thomas Clarkson was and what his role was in the passing of the bill. His story was a fascinating one. As a young man at Cambridge he entered in to an essay competition, the topic of which was, 'is it lawful to enslave the unconsenting [sic]?' Clarkson won the competition and had what he described as a spiritual revelation from God. This was, that if what he'd written in the essay was true then some person should do something about it. Clarkson's father was a Reverend and he himself was ordained a Deacon and was described as devout. His sense of calling and the revelation he received led him to devote the rest of his life to trying to abolish the slave trade. Clarkson was typical of the early abolitionists in that almost all of them belonged to varying denominations of Christianity. Perhaps it is the Christian spirit of doing the right thing, come what may and which is exemplified in the life of Thomas Clarkson, that is part of what the Luciferian elite are so keen to destroy.


The 'Ecumenical' One World Religion


 Again, this is a complex issue but we should remember that the original Tower of Babel was in part an attempt at a unified religious system.  We can then see that mass immigration and multiculturalism are, to some degree, a part of the drive to unite the world's religions. The religious system of the New World Order will be one where the religions of the world unite around, what is said to be, their common roots. This ecumenical drive is, of course, being led by the Papacy. At an 'Interfaith Meeting' in 1999 the Pope presided over an assembly of Buddhist monks, Zoroastrian priests, Catholic cardinals, Hindu gurus, American Indian 
shamen, Jewish rabbis and Muslim Muftis. Associated press reported that:


 
Pope John Paul II kisses a koran. A book which,
 amongst other things, denies the divinity of Jesus.
"Pope John Paul II was endorsed by consensus as the planet's chief spiritual guide and overseer and  religious fundamentalists who refuse to go along with the global ecumenical movement are to be silenced. They must also be denounced as "dangerous extremists" full of hate."



This 'global ecumenical movement' is being continued by Pope Benedict. Above is just a hint of what is happening in this respect. The implications of it are enormous and they require an article all of their own but it was necessary to mention it in order to begin to grasp the fact that all is not what it seems where mass immigration and multiculturalism is concerned. There's a hidden agenda that is being worked towards that most are completely unaware of.

Multiculturalism Was Meant To Fail


 As we've seen with Andrew Neather's revelations, there was a clear intent to spread 'multiculturalism' by the Labour party. For years anyone who criticised it was vigorously denounced with the usual and predictable slurs of racist, xenophobe or fascist as discussed earlier. Yet in recent months several European leaders including British Prime Minister David Cameron have made speeches pronouncing multiculturalism a failure. Whilst this may have appeared to some to be altruistic behaviour by the politicians involved, it was actually all part of the broader agenda and it should be no surprise that the same message is being played out across the EU. What people don't realise is that they always knew it would fail. It was always meant to fail. It was only ever going to be a short transition to the next step which will be integration, all in the name of peace, unity, community cohesion, reducing 'racism' or some other flowery, fluffy, feel good buzzword their research groups have shown to be effective.


 
PM David Cameron switches on the Olympic stadium lights
 in a ceremony performed on December 21st (the winter
 solstice). The lights are in the shape of a pyramid with an
 illuminated capstone representative of Horus (Lucifer).
Further psychological manipulation along these lines can be expected in the hype surrounding the occult ritual that is the Olympic Games in London, 2012. They are being promoted with the slogan, The World In One City' but this is yet more subtle brainwashing and manipulation by the Satanic elite as They slowly move towards the desired end game. That is the complete suppression and eventual elimination of the white British as part of Albert Pike's 'mongrelising' of the masses and the creation of a slave race incapable of any sort of resistance. However uncomfortable some may feel about discussing these issues, it's essential that they are and their true importance conveyed.

 There is absolutely nothing particularly moral about multiculturalism. It is a state enforced creation that has been inflicted on a mostly unwilling people. As we've seen both it and mass immigration are integral parts of the Luciferian and Satanic world government agenda that is intended to result in the mental, physical and spiritual enslavement of the whole of humanity. When you research this subject in greater detail and see it in its true light, what becomes apparent is that this deeply evil enterprise requires the destruction of the 'white' nations of the world. This can't be described as anything other than genocide.


The Genocide Of The British People

 Some may scoff at describing what is happening in Britain today as genocidal. However, the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG) defines genocide as:


"... deliberately inflicting on [a] group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part."




Webster's Dictionary defines it as:





"... the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group."






Can anybody deny that this will be the result of the policies carried out by the ruling oligarchy and their puppet politicians?






Genocide, as defined above, seems to be a precise definition of what we're seeing in Britain and particularly England, in present times. A recent report stated that a census to be carried out in March this year is expected to show that the number of 'white' pupils in Birmingham education has fallen to 47%. The tipping point has been reached and the future of this English city is for its native English to be an ethnic minority. Indeed in a previous report it was stated that the number of children under the age of seven in education in Birmingham was 40% Asian and 39% 'white' with the rest Afro-caribbean and other ethnicities. It seems that the indigenous English are going to be a minority in the second largest city in the land and they won't even constitute the largest ethnic group. Birmingham isn't the only city in this position. London, Bradford, Leicester and many others aren't far behind. All done through lies and deception, without any mandate and against the wishes of the majority.




Not only that but, as we've seen, these children, of all ethnicities, are already being indoctrinated, through the education system, into becoming willing members (world citizens) of the New World Order 'global village'. It is undoubtedly presented in harmless sounding, even desirable terms, such as unity, tolerance and diversity along with a positive appraisal of all things 'global', but the end result of this brainwashing will be a long way from that. It is merely the beginning of the 'mongrelisation' and enslavement envisaged by Albert Pike.




As part of this process, done under the guise of 'social justice' or 'equality', ethnic minority young people are encouraged to affirm or 'celebrate' their cultures and interests. Meanwhile young native English or British people are encouraged to do the opposite. It's their culture that is (mis)represented as the 'problem' and as such to be denounced and denigrated. It's through this process that the native British are to be 'changed' with ethnic minorities being cynically used as the catalyst.



 There's no doubt that what is happening to Britain and England in particular, can be classed as genocide. As researcher and writer Tony Shell says:

"... the English are a native people - an indigenous (aboriginal) people of the British Isles."









 
English children at the turn of the 19th century
Often the knee jerk, brainwashed, response to this is that this cannot be the case because we are a nation of mongrels or something suitably derogatory. This is said to be because of the influx of some Angles, Saxons, Danes, Romans and Normans in our past history. Leaving apart the fact that no other nation appears to be subject to such stringent standards let's refer to the work of Bryan Sykes who is a Professor of Human Genetics at the University of Oxford and a Fellow of Wolfson College. His research into this area led him to the conclusion that:




"In spite of all these later contributions, the genetic makeup of Britain and Ireland is overwhelmingly what it has been since the Neolithic period and to a very considerable extent since the Mesolithic period".


 He summed this up in a quote from his book 'The Blood of the Isles', published in 2006:


"We are an ancient people, and though the Isles have been the target of invasion and opposed settlement from abroad ever since Julius Caesar first stepped on to the shingle shores of Kent, these have barely scratched the topsoil of our deep-rooted ancestry. However we may feel about ourselves and about each other, we are genetically rooted in a Celtic past. The Irish, the Welsh and the Scots know this, but the English sometimes think otherwise. But, just a little way beneath the surface, the strands of ancestry weave us all together as the children of a common past".


 The English, Scots, Welsh and other European peoples are very bit as much worthy of protection as any other ethnic group around the world and it's a curious form of reverse racism that pretends otherwise.


 I often wonder what the residents of Kingston Jamaica, for example, would say if they were told that it was necessary to have massive levels of immigration that would result in them being an ethnic minority in their city. How would they respond if the new ethnic majority were, let's say, Pakistani muslims and Kingston now had more mosques than churches. In turn, how would the residents of Islamabad react if they, as a result of the lies and deceit of their political elite, were soon to be ethnic minorities in their major cities with largely Christian Nigerians being the new majority. My guess is that it wouldn't be welcomed as some fantastic new multicultural utopia and would be fiercely resisted.


 
The new Zambians?
Advocates of mass immigration and multiculturalism often claim that it makes no difference what the colour of your skin is and that who really cares who is the majority or the minority. The pretence here is that any differences are only cosmetic, hence the constant references to skin colour. Does anyone seriously think that nothing much would change if the residents of Lusaka, Zambia went from being  majority African to majority Chinese. Do they think that there would be no spiritual, cultural or political changes at all. Even if there were said to be some economic benefits do you think the newly made Zambian minority (against their will) would think the sacrifice of their culture or way of life was worth it? There's a very good reason why discussions about issues such as race, mass immigration and multiculturalism have been made either taboo, or are heavily controlled, by the ruling elite. It's because if we did have a chance to genuinely discuss these things freely we'd begin to see through a great deal of the manipulation and brainwashing on the subject.

The 'We Are All One Consciousness' Deception

 Just as the left has been manipulated so too have a considerable number in the so called 'truth movement'. There are many, myself included, who consider David Icke to be an agent, conscious or otherwise, of the Satanic 'elite'. Interestingly, his 'solution' to the New World Order agenda is for us all to realise that we are 'all one consciousness' and that 'everything is an illusion'. A concept that, arguably, has its modern roots in the teachings of the Catholic Jesuit priest, who was often called the 'father of the New Age movement, Pierre Teilhard De Chardin. This 'illusion' happens to include nations, races and cultures. The subtle deception at play here is that in order to defeat the New World Order we have to realise that nation states and racial and cultural distinctions are not only unimportant they are actually illusory. Of course the destruction of nations and national identities just happen to be key New World Order goals.



 
Luciferic 'sun in triangle' image taken from
Zeitgeist The Movie
Similarly with the popular Zeitgeist 'anti-NWO' series of films. Their solution to the problems of the world is a 'good' world government (the Venus Project) that doesn't recognise race or national boundaries. Sounds wonderful until you fully understand what this entails. Zeitgeist has been exposed as little more than a 'repackaged Communism for 21st century truth seekers' but it's actually a lot more dangerous than that.


The 'solutions' proposed by David Icke, Zeitgeist and others ensure that, not only do large numbers of the 'truth movement' inadvertently further the New World Order agenda, but that they also actively deride and see as their enemy anyone who does seek to protect or defend their nation or national identity. What those behind the New World Order desire is complete conformity so as to more easily control the human race. As with the 'left' there are many in the truth movement who haven't considered the full implications of the complete loss of their national identity. What should also be noted is that the racial destruction of the European peoples is just the first step. Do we really want to eliminate all races on the earth? If not then why support the destruction of those peoples denigrated as 'white'? It should be remembered that this long term genocidal process is irreversible. The survival of those ethnic groups collectively referred to as the 'white race' such as the English, French, German, Scottish, Danish or Welsh is really the prerequisite for the survival of all the races on this earth.

Nation States Are The True Diversity Of The World

 The Satanic 'elite' make great claims about 'celebrating diversity' when in reality all They are really doing is highlighting differences with a view to eliminating them. They have forced together disparate and largely incompatible groups with a view to fomenting division, problems, instability and even violence in order to create the conditions necessary to advance their New World Order agenda. True diversity is all the wonderful cultures and races that have developed over centuries. The same ones that need to be destroyed for this New World Order.

 The best defence against it are sovereign, independent, nations, co-operating freely where required. Their fear is that if just one country slips out of their control it will serve as an example to the rest of true freedom and independence from the global enslavement agenda. These agents of deception claim that 'races are a false construct' that are meant to 'divide us'. This is clever psychological manipulation. Races aren't a 'false construct' and neither do they inevitably cause 'division'. It is the Satanic elite that manipulate and create false conflict and it is them we need to do away with not the cultural heritage that is the creation of the wonderfully diverse peoples of the earth.

The Psychological Manipulation Of Humanity



This sort of psychological manipulation is a very good example of what we are constantly subjected to and of which all of us should be aware. It's often referred to as 'perception management' but that is really just a polite way of saying brainwashing. It really is something that we should all investigate thoroughly. Merely being aware of the existence of brainwashing and the techniques used, greatly diminishes its effectiveness. This issue is highlighted in another quote from the Fabian Bertrand Russell. In his book 'The Impact of Science on Society', published in 1952, Russell discusses the subject of mass psychology and gives us an insight into the thought processes of the elite.


"What is essential in mass psychology is the art of persuasion. If you compare a speech of Hitler’s with a speech of (say) Edmund Burke, you will see what strides have been made in the art since the eighteenth century. What went wrong formerly was that people had read in books that man is a rational animal and framed their arguments on this hypothesis. We now know that limelight and a brass band do more to persuade than can be done by the most elegant train of syllogisms. It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the State with money and equipment.


This subject [mass psychology] will make great strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship. Anaxagoras maintained that snow is black, but no one believed him. The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakeable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at. First, that the influence of home is obstructive. Second, that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten. Third, that verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective. Fourth, that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity. But I anticipate. It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark grey.”


Although the desire to indoctrinate and brainwash remains the same, the techniques used to do it have developed enormously since the 1950's. Possibly the greatest development in this regard has been the television. Edward Bernays has been described as the 'father of public relations'. In his book 'Propaganda', written in 1928, he said the following:


"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ...We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. ...In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons...who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind."


 In the essay ‘Brainwashing: How the British Use the Media for Mass Psychological Warfare’ media ‘expert’ Hal Becker is quoted as saying:


“The media is the most powerful weapon and ‘agent of change’ in the fight to establish a ‘one-worldist’, 'neo-Malthusian' order that will transcend and obliterate the concept of the nation-state.”



It's worth reflecting on these quotes. We have been and continue to be overwhelmed with propaganda relating to mass immigration and multiculturalism. There are, however, a few that either resist or are immune to the brainwashing. It is these people that need to be demonised or otherwise discredited as hinted at above. Very few dissenting views are allowed and any that are have to be framed in such a way as to make them seem 'racist' or 'fascist'. Make no mistake, it is Their intention to destroy Britain and mass immigration and multiculturalism are just two of the methods They are using. Once you become aware of this intention it's possible to see the relentless propaganda to this effect in all the media, but especially TV.

 How the demonisation works is illustrated in the following section taken from an essay on the Hidden Evil website. In it (Anthony) Sutton and (Patrick) Wood warned:


"Anyone in the U.S. who promotes unwelcome news for the elite receives some unwelcome attention in return. This attention includes the use of experts, mainstream media and anti-hate organisations for well-coordinated character assassination. According to author Perloff, a document released by the House Committee on Un-American Activities, on September 23, 1956 entitled, Propaganda and the Alert Citizen outlined the tactics reportedly used by the Establishment to discredit opposition.


 Quoting from this document, Perloff wrote:


'The tactic used had a prototype in a directive issued by the Communist Party... It read: When certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them, after suitable build-ups, as Fascist or Nazi or anti-Semitic, and use the prestige of anti-Fascist and tolerance organisations to discredit them. ... In the public mind constantly associate those who oppose us with those names which already have a bad smell.'”


For an example of how the ruling 'elites' view us this short excerpt of an interview with Aldous Huxley is enlightening. In it he discusses the techniques for the 'chemical control' of humanity. There are many who think that the future world government system will be something akin to Orwell's 1984. The reality is that it is much more likely to be closer to Huxley's vision in his book 'Brave New World' where 'the slaves ... do not have to be coerced because they love their servitude'.


The Stigmatisation Of Nationalism



 
Establishment stooge Nick Griffin whose role it is to
associate all forms of nationalism with Nazism or fascism
That Perloff quote above was used in the article, 'Is Nick Griffin A Freemason (Why The New World Order Needs The BNP)?', where the case was made for the leader of the British National Party being 'controlled opposition' and attempted to show why it is so important to the agenda. I'd begun to see how the BNP were an essential part of the dialectic that enabled opposition to mass immigration, multiculturalism, cultural Marxism, the European Union and the wider globalisation agenda to be labeled as extreme, fascist, xenophobic, racist or Nazi. All very strong mind control trigger-words, which were now to be associated with any form of nationalist resistance to the New World Order.

 There was also another benefit of having the BNP identified with nationalism and then disparaged in such a way. Many of the issues they raise are ignored or not discussed because to do otherwise would give ‘aid to the fascists’ or something similar. The irony here is that to not discuss these things gives 'aid' to the real fascists, the Satanic oligarchy. Again very clever mind control tactics employed by them. Even if you raise concerns about issues such as multiculturalism or mass immigration you run the risk of being labelled a BNP ‘fellow traveller’ and indirectly tagged with the slurs mentioned above. Genuine public debate on these important issues is therefore severely restricted and controlled, if allowed at all.

 Incidentally the other key role performed by Nick Griffin is to continually destabilise the party by engineering damaging splits and dissent within it. This serves to prevent any organised opposition to the real fascists plan for Their New World Order. Any keen observer of the BNP in recent years can see it is a role he has played only too well.

 This is just one more example of the 'divide and rule' policy being pursued by the controlling elites. As those behind the globalising 'New World Order' agenda slowly but surely transfer power upwards to an unaccountable 'elite' few, the Balkanising effects of mass immigration and multiculturalism make any concerted resistance almost impossible. The government becomes a sort of conflict manager enabling the real controllers to skilfully play different ethnic groups off against each other in whatever way furthers their agenda.


 The 'liberal left', under the hidden guidance of the Satanic oligarchy, enthusiastically sought and continues to seek, to suppress any nationalistic, cultural, or ethnic solidarity among the native British, particularly the English. This is supposedly done because the abolition of 'nationalism' will somehow mean the end of war and conflict and inaugurate world peace. Nationalism is really an extension of tribalism and it is ridiculous to think that tribalism can be eliminated, apart from it being essentially unnecessary. Only a ruthless totalitarian government could hope to do so and only the New World Order  'elite' and a few deluded Marxists and Nazis desire that. The irony is that other ethic groups aren't being made to dissolve their tribal feelings and loyalties. Quite the reverse, they are encouraged and even funded with grants through numerous ethnic only organisations. What those on the liberal left fail to see is the real agenda behind those who fund and control these things from behind the scenes.

 'Tribalism' doesn't necessarily lead to conflict. A good nationalist always seeks to cooperate with other countries to each others mutual benefit. Besides even if the whole world had the same green skin colour, the green people north of the river could still be manipulated into conflict with the green people on the south side if it was in the interests of the ruling oligarchs. It is They that are the problem. It's being increasingly revealed that many, if not all, of the conflicts throughout history, including the major World Wars, can be traced back to Their manipulations and machinations.

 The forefathers of the same ruling 'elite' that are today behind the New World Order and it's agenda for global enslavement. As stated earlier, nationalism is actually the best defence against these tyrants. What they fear the most is that a country will escape their influence and be seen to be able to thrive and succeed, as it surely could and thereby serving as an example to other countries around the world. As with a large proportion of the 'truth movement', the liberal left have been manipulated into thinking that nationalism is the problem and by their promotion of global solutions they are, inadvertently, assisting the real fascist agenda.

The 'Mongrelisation' Of The West


 
'Pampered white liberal' Andrew Marr
The 'pampered white liberal' and establishment flunky, journalist Andrew Marr, called for:


"...widespread and vigorous miscegenation (race mixing)' [and the] vigorous use of state power to coerce and repress [those who resists mass immigration and multiculturism]"


 I would assume he did this whilst being completely unaware of the Satanic agenda he's helping to further.


 Of course miscegenation is the very thing the Luciferian cabal desire in their bid to 'mongrelise' humanity and create the 'new race of humans' similar in their appearance to the Ancient Egyptians. This is always dressed up as being the very noblest of ideals; the unity and oneness of man without discrimination, complete equality etc. The reality is that it is another Tower of Babel where this new race, devoid of all previous cultural and racial distinctions, is designed to serve an elite few in thrall to their sun god Lucifer. These self styled 'philosopher kings', think many years in advance and what we are witnessing now is only the beginning of a long process. Make no mistake, there is an all-out psychological propaganda war designed to promote miscegenation wherever possible, particularly in the media, entertainment, sports and education systems. Every Pavlovian trick is being used to make miscegenation appear cool, trendy, fashionable and even desirable.

 People may scoff at the idea that we can be unconsciously reprogrammed to do these things but it happens all the time. In 1920 Edward Bernays was approached by the American Tobacco Corporation who wanted to encourage more women to smoke. Up until that point smoking was very much a male pursuit that few women partook in. From his research Bernays determined that women viewed the cigarette as a phallic symbol and associated it with power and dominance, hence their lack of interest. In order to 'reprogram' them Bernays decided to create a 'publicity' event during a New York Easter parade. He coached a group of young women to dramatically light up their cigarettes making sure they were conspicuous and that several reporters were present to record the 'event. Bernays explained how this was a 'declaration of independence' on behalf of the women and an expression of 'female solidarity'. This shocking behaviour (for the time) ensured a media frenzy the end result of which was that women had successfully been reprogrammed. No longer did they view the cigarette as a phallic symbol, it was now a 'torch of freedom'. The use of cigarettes by women steadily increased from that day, all thanks to an American tobacco company and some clever brainwashing, perception management and mind control on behalf of Bernays.

 The techniques used in modern times are now far more sophisticated and the medium of choice and the one that is the most effective, is the television. Gerry Hines, a Programme Organiser for the BBC, was quoted in Race Today as saying:


"Newspapers have to sell in order to live, so does commercial TV. That leaves the BBC as the only truly public service medium in this country disseminating information, entertainment, and in the case of race relations, propaganda. We are unashamed to admit it, is what we are doing."

 This isn't the benign, altruistic endeavour it appears to be. It's the first steps in the subtle genocide of the English and British that will end in their eventual biological destruction. Nobody should dictate to another whom they should and shouldn't marry but that's a far cry from the pernicious attempts at mind control and brainwashing that has been and continues to be, waged on this issue.

 President Tubman of Liberia is reported to have said that:

“... we are opposed to integration. It is a bad thing and we condemn it. Why should we destroy our identity? We love our black skins and we are proud of our heritage. Our country is open to all people of African descent".

 Should he be condemned as a racist and forced to have quotas for Asians, Arabs and Europeans that would see those of African descent become a minority? Should there then be a secret and sustained attempt to promote the idea of miscegenation, by any means possible, in order to change the biological characteristics of those very same Africans? This isn't about miscegenation per se, it's about deliberately setting out to promote the idea with the sole intent of altering the genetics of the target ethnic group that is perceived to be an obstacle to your plan to enslave and subjugate humanity.

 As an aside, it's worth observing that if the leader of European country ever expressed a desire to keep the racial heritage of their country pure, there would be a massive outcry led by the liberal left.

 Marr cheers because the elite controlled government pass a Race Relations Act that he says:

"... will impose the will of the state on millions…"



Again completely oblivious (I assume) as to who truly controls that state and what their intent is. Like Gerry Hines, he also works for the BBC which is the major conduit in this country for the mind control, brainwashing and propaganda we briefly looked at earlier. When considering Andrew Marr and the scores of 'left wing' journalists like him, I'm reminded of another quote from the essay, 'Brainwashing: How the British Use the Media for Mass Psychological Warfare:'

"[The Club of Rome] can also call on the capabilities of a mass psychological warfare machine, also run by the British and their assets, which extends into key phases of media production, and includes writers and psychiatrists who help shape the content, and the pollsters who fine-tune and analyse the impact on targeted populations. Beyond this interacting network, there are millions of participants involved in the production, distribution, and transmission of media messages, whose thinking, in turn, has been shaped by the content of the media product, and who are, effectively, self-brainwashed by the culture within which they live."


Communism As Anti-Fascism



What the so called 'anti-fascists' (who act more like fascists themselves much of the time) of the 'left' don't realise is that, with their protests against anyone who speaks out about mass immigration or the many problems associated with multiculturalism, they are being used by the real fascists and are unwittingly supporting their aims. The protesters of the UAF are destined to be enslaved by the New World Order elite every bit as much as those of the EDL. A common thread with organisations such as Unite Against Fascism, Antifa, Hope Not Hate etc is that they are all funded and controlled by the left. Usually the Labour Party or Trade Union movement, both of whom are themselves are controlled by, higher, globalist forces. Interestingly the logo for the Hope Not Hate organisation is a (Luciferian) sun symbol (why use that?) which gives you some idea of who really controls it. Ironically the swastika of the Nazi's is also an ancient sun symbol. One other observation is  the name of the British newspaper published by the Communist party is the 'Morning Star'. A descriptive term often used for Lucifer.

 Searchlight is the parent organisation behind many of these off-shoots. Its founder, Gerry Gable, once ran for the Communist Party of Great Britain. It should never be forgotten that Communism and Fascism are really two sides of the same totalitarian coin. On the one side we have the national socialists and on the other the international socialists. Both are as bad as one another but for some reason, despite being responsible for many more deaths than Fascism, the Communist/left/international Socialists/Marxists seem to be often portrayed as well intentioned good guys whose hearts are in the right place but who sometimes don't quite get things right.

Divide And Rule: The UAF And The EDL


As an aside, the current 'clash' between the UAF and the EDL is a good example of 'divide and rule'. In this case though, there's probably a bit more to it. As mentioned before, the Hegelian dialectic seeks to create conflict of some sort between two polar opposites, the thesis and antithesis. The idea is that by controlling this conflict they can shape and control the outcome of it, the synthesis. This is essentially what such large numbers of muslim immigrants have been encouraged to come to this country for. The ruling elite wish to 'change' us racially, culturally and spiritually and manipulated conflict with Islam is just one of the ways they are trying to do it.




However, the conflict we see in Britain is just one front in a much larger 'dialectic' They have engineered between Islam and the West. I suspect the low level conflict we are seeing now in Britain is just a hint of what will happen should current friction in the Middle East expand into something more deadly.




I'm certainly not unaware of the true nature and history of Islam and neither, I'd add, are the real controllers of this country. The ones who have overseen the huge rise in muslim immigration in recent times. Yes we have differences, many, in many respects, irreconcilable, but it will do neither of us any good if we fall into the traps that have been intentionally laid for us. It's important we understand who our true enemy is. Only then do we have any hope of resolving those differences without the sort of violence They are only too keen to exploit.

Anti-Immigration And Multiculturalism Is Not Racism


Israel Shamir, in the same article linked to above, states:


"Mass immigration is ruinous because it squeezes the local population, and life becomes worse for everybody but the wealthiest strata. It is a simple matter of less territory per person, and that is bad. This observation calls for no racial explanations. Why then do some anti-immigration groups regurgitate racialist slogans?


It is a triumph of the Masters of Discourse [the 'perception managers' aka 'brainwashers']. They have succeeded in convincing nearly everyone that anti-immigration is racism. The anti-immigration policy makers simply accepted this silly notion. Perhaps it is easier to go along with such a subjective argument than to fight it. The most committed groups integrated the racialists, not willing to abandon their primary mission for artificial divisions. Objection to immigration is not due to 'belief in racial superiority' or to 'racial hate', it is a perfectly normal defensive reaction of the working classes (and of those members of upper strata who feel compassion and empathy for them).


Now we can better understand the nature of the self-styled ‘anti-racist’ groups: Antifa, Searchlight, Expo and similar bodies. They are storm troopers for the Predator. They crush local solidarity groups. They act as a solvent, disintegrating traditional society…. People are impressionable, and they can’t withstand a massive attack of mass media."

 He also makes an observation that those on the 'left' should consider.


"If you are told ‘you are racist’ because you object to mass immigration, respond with ‘you are uprooting poison’ [or] 'you are the Predators’ tool', or 'you are on the side of landlords and moneylenders', and it will be true."


 I'd add you are on the side, knowingly or otherwise, of the Satanists and Luciferians who wish to enslave mankind and that would be true as well. Shamir also claimed that racism is an invention created by the 'Masters of Discourse'. He added:


"... it is a tempting sin to speak ill of others"


 This is true whether it be French 'frogs', English 'rosbif', or Irish 'paddy's'. Shamir continues:


"...[but] there is a fine but clear difference between the light witty bitchiness of Oscar Wilde and spit-dropping drivel."




It is this difference that those behind the political correctness agenda purposely fail to distinguish. The creation of racism offences was one of the key recommendations of the Frankfurt School cultural Marxists that sought to undermine and destroy Western society.  They were also the source of the dogma that is political correctness which is being used to similar effect.

 Several years ago I was racially abused by a gang of Asian males. Reflecting afterwards I realised I wasn't in the least bit offended by them screaming 'white b****rd' at me. Why would being called 'white' bother me in the slightest. If anything it was the 'spit-dropping' way it was said. That is, it was the abuse itself that was the problem and the threat of violence that was implied by it. Why then should ethnic minorities be encouraged to consider that someone calling them 'black' is the very worst thing that could happen? Wouldn't we all be better off if instead we were encouraged to ignore and shrug off such comments? To encourage anyone called 'black' to think, why on earth should I be bothered about someone calling me that. The real problem arises if the 'abuse' is done in a vitriolic or threatening manner but that is true of any abuse regardless of how it is framed or who the target is. The reason that a sensible approach such as this is never considered is because the 'elite' wish to exploit racial tensions for Their own benefit so it's in Their best interests to create as much of it as possible. They want to encourage 'black' people to perpetually consider themselves as being victims and at the same time for 'white' people to assume the role of guilty oppressors.

The Truth About Communism

 As regards Communism it's worth reflecting on the words of R.E. McMaster writing in the international investment newsletter, 'The Reaper':


“The goal of international communism is not to destroy Western international debt capitalism. The goal of international communism is to enslave mankind at the behest of Western international debt capitalism.”


Researcher Anthony J. Hilder put it similarly when he said:


“Communism is not [and never was] a creation of the masses to overthrow the Banking establishment, but rather a creation of the Banking establishment to overthrow and enslave the people.”


Oswald Spengler was even more direct:

“There is no proletarian, not even a Communist movement, that has not operated in the interests of money, and for the time being permitted by money - and that without the idealists among its leaders having the slightest suspicion of the fact.”



 
Stalin in masonic 'hidden hand' pose
The 'banking establishment' certainly funded both both Communism and Fascism (particularly its Nazi offshoot) but those who think the 'banksters' are the root cause of the problems should be aware that there are undoubtedly still higher, darker forces, pulling their strings. Those forces created and controlled (and still do) Communism as the ideal antithesis to the Capitalist thesis and it is the Hegelian doctrine of controlled conflict between these two that is supposed to result in the New World Order 'synthesis'. Freemasonry certain plays an important role in Communism with many of its leaders such as Marx and Stalin being high ranking members.

 The Hegelian dialectic (controlled conflict) is widely used in the furtherance of the New World Order objective. This explains perfectly why the puppet politicians of the st

« Last Edit: June 15, 2014, 10:24:04 PM by the leveller »

 
Share this topic...
In a forum
(BBCode)
In a site/blog
(HTML)


SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk