show/hide profile info
Register to take part
email

Letter to Michael Thornton.MP.COMMONS COMPLAINT TO THE SPEAKER IN THE UPPER HOUS

  • 0 Replies
  • 1122 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Offline the leveller

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • 4010
  • +75/-0
Please read from the bottom upwards
============================
[email protected]
 Subject: RE: COMMONS COMPLAINT TO THE SPEAKER IN THE UPPER HOUSE
 Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 20:02:17 +0000

Dear Michael
 King John an odious man who was forcing the wives of the Barons into his bed and then because they did not enter wholeheartedly into it would announce the next day at court that Baron what's his names wife was a lousy shag, so the Barons wanted him dead, and he was oppressing the yeomen of England using foreign mercenaries. So the Yeomen wanted him dead felt in need of some heavy duty support, so he met the Papal Legate Arch Bishop Pandolf at Dover in1213 and surrendered England to the Pope, renting it back for 1000 marks a year 700 for England 300 for Ireland. As soon as his son came of age he wrote to the Pope saying he Henry answered directly to God for all things Ecclesiastical and the people of England for all things spiritual and he stopped the money. He then placed all the Barons who had assisted John on trial for treason.
 
 In 1366 the then Pope wrote to King Edward III demanding the unpaid monies, Edward spoke to the Bishops and Barons and they convened a meeting with the commonality of England at which the Estates of England discussed the demand for money. The estates of England is the highest law giving body in the land. They met at Runnymede to force John to accept Magna Carta and in Westminster to produce the Declaration of Right which effectively sacked James II and offered the Crown to William and Mary. After discussing the Popes demands they went to King Edward III and told him England did not belong to King John it was not his to give away as he only held the it in trust for those who follow on. John broke the law. The monies were not to be paid and Edward was not a vassal King to Rome.
 
 This major constitutional ruling by the estates of England makes it Illegal for Her Majesty to sign any EEC/EU Treaties because they surrender powers to govern to a foreign power, Maastricht in particular purports to make Her Majesty a vassal Queen to Brussels. All EEC/EU Treaties constitute acts of treason contrary to the Common and Constitutional Law of England and the 1351 Treason Act and the 1848 Treason Felony Act. Every time you vote for an EU treaty or regulation to be imposed on this ancient Kingdom you commit treason. Her Majesty we will not hang for treason we will hang her wicked and evil advisors, who are undoubtedly the same people who have welcomed denizens into public life when the law and the oath from the 1689 Bill of Rights specifically refuses them any say in any aspect of the governance of this Kingdom. I am not alone in believing that Her Majesty's government is worse than that found in any banana republic. Albert 
 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


From: [email protected]
 To: [email protected]
 Subject: Re: COMMONS COMPLAINT TO THE SPEAKER IN THE UPPER HOUSE
 Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 19:19:27 +0000

Don't forget the queen signed all the acts that are currently law..so all have her authority.

I have no objection to you arguing for leaving the EU. That is your opinion and you have a right to it. It is the fact that the only reference to naturalised citizens in the original email are those who are of a non european ethnic origin. From a part of the world that sent it's young men to fight and die for us in 2 world wars.


Mike Thornton

MP for Eastleigh

Telephone:

Eastleigh: 023 8062 0007

Westminster: 020 7219 7334

 

From: albert burgess

Date:04/12/2014 19:01 (GMT+00:00)

To: "THORNTON, Michael"

Subject: RE: COMMONS COMPLAINT TO THE SPEAKER IN THE UPPER HOUSE

 

Dear Michael
 Perhaps you should read the Bill of Rights which incorporates the Declaration of Rights 1689. Neither of which remove anything from the anointed sovereign. What they do is restate those limitations placed upon English Kings by Alfred the Great and restated in Magna Carta 1215. According to Professor Taswell-Langmead Professor of Constitutional Law and History UCL who in his book English Constitutional History 1896 in which he states the Bill of Rights took nothing from the King rather it returned the authority of the King back to where it was before the Tudors and Stuarts usurped the Throne. I would suggest you read the oath from the Act of Supremacy 1559 and the 1689 Bill of Rights and then tell me by what slight of hand you equate them with our membership of the EEC/EU. I am not in the least ashamed of myself I have a life time of voluntary service to this Kingdom, and have been studying English common and constitutional law for the last eight years and I actually have a better selection of constitutional law books in my home than you have in the House of Commons Library, you might find a visit their useful, and have a read of a Treatise on the Law of the Prerogatives of the Crown: and the Relative Duties and Rights of the Subject. your copy is dated 1816. Albert
 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


From: [email protected]
 To: [email protected]
 Subject: Re: COMMONS COMPLAINT TO THE SPEAKER IN THE UPPER HOUSE
 Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 18:26:37 +0000

Perhaps you should read the Bill of Rights which restricts the power of the monarch not to mention Habeas Corpus. And perhaps you ought try and understand the traditions and history of this great country of ours. A country I love and whose traditions of tolerance, decency and hospitality are we weaved into this country's very existence

 

You should be ashamed of your attitudes which any true Englishman would denounce. Stand up for England and English traditional beliefs

 

God save the Queen. 

 

 

Mike Thornton

MP for Eastleigh

Telephone:

Eastleigh: 023 8062 0007

Westminster: 020 7219 7334

 

-------- Original message --------

From: albert burgess

Date:04/12/2014 18:14 (GMT+00:00)

To: MICHAEL THORNTON and others

Subject: RE: COMMONS COMPLAINT TO THE SPEAKER IN THE UPPER HOUSE

 

Dear Michael
 Your comment re arresting HRH Prince Philip is fatuous, and simply illustrates the total lack of constitutional knowledge in the House of Commons. I fully realise you all seem to think that you are sovereign, but by the common law of Kingship and Parliamentary vote sovereignty lies entirely in the hands of our most Sovereign Lady Queen Elizabeth II. The lawfully anointed Queen of England from which all her other titles pre-eminences superiorities and supremacies flow. Indeed if you understood the common and constitutional law of this ancient Kingdom you might not make such a piss poor job of legislating. Albert


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


From: alpha14
 To: [email protected]
 CC: [email protected]
 Subject: RE: COMMONS COMPLAINT TO THE SPEAKER IN THE UPPER HOUSE
 Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 16:49:36 +0000

You KNOW what is meant.

 

Clever comments never come across the way they’re intended.

 

Rex

 

-----Original Message-----
From: THORNTON, Michael [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 04 December 2014 16:10
To: Alpha14
Subject: Re: COMMONS COMPLAINT TO THE SPEAKER IN THE UPPER HOUSE

 

 

Ok...so Prince Philip should be arrested as well?

 

 

Mike Thornton

MP for Eastleigh

Telephone:

Eastleigh: 023 8062 0007

Westminster: 020 7219 7334

 

-------- Original message --------

From: Alpha14

Date:04/12/2014 14:55 (GMT+00:00)

To: "THORNTON, Michael"

Subject: COMMONS COMPLAINT TO THE SPEAKER IN THE UPPER HOUSE

 

Dear Mr Thornton
 
 The following is for your information and awareness.
 
 It has already been sent to the MP for Salisbury.
 
 Rex P
 Salisbury
 
 
 
 

 
                                                                                         Albert Burgess

 Mr Khalid Mahmood and Mr Yasmin Qureshi
                                                                                         15 Parliament Road

 House of Commons
                                                                                          Thame

 London
                                                                                           South Oxfordshire

 SW1A 1AA
                                                                                               OX9 3TE

 

 

 
 01-12-2014
 

 Dear Mr Mahmood and Mr Qureshi,
 

 REFERENCE: YOUR COMPLAINT TO THE SPEAKER IN THE UPPER HOUSE

 

 It is an unfortunate fact of life for you that under English Common Law
 (higher law) each House of Parliament has a cognisance to conduct its
 own business in its own way and that by attempting to subvert the right
 of the Upper House to do that, you are committing a major treason
 against the common law arrangements for Parliament, not to mention your
 treason by trying to overawe the House of Lords contrary to Sec 3 of the
 1848 Treason Felony Act, the penalty for which if found guilty, is life
 imprisonment. 

 

 Indeed your very presence in the House of Commons constitutes a treason
 against English Common and Constitutional Law.  Let me explain as it is
 patently clear you have no idea of the laws of the Ancient Kingdom which
 has provided you shelter.

 

 You are both naturalised British subjects of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth
 II and have a duty to her.  However your primary duty in law is to your
 country of origin.  If you were born here, then it is, in law, to the
 country of origin of your father add infinitum.

 

 As a naturalised subject, you become a denizen half way between a
 natural born subject and an alien.  You may buy, sell, leave or inherit
 property and enjoy most though not all of the rights of a natural born
 subject. What you cannot do however, is be invested with any order of
 nobility, nor can you sit on the Privy Council, nor can you sit in
 either House of Parliament nor hold any public office.  In short, by law
 you get no say in how this Ancient Kingdom is governed.

 

 As a result of this law, I have asked the Commissioner of the Metropolis
 to arrest every denizen in each House or who holds public office for
 interview under caution to determine who aided you into a position the
 law refuses you, with a view to arresting and charging those natural
 born subjects with treason.  A visit to the House of Commons Library
 might be educational for you though the library is only available to
 Members of Parliament  - which you are not, even though you purport to
 be.  Oh and before you attempt to play the race card don't bother.  I am
 English and a natural born subject and we don't scare.

 

 Respectfully submitted,

 

 Albert Burgess.

UK Parliament Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.



 
UK Parliament Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.



« Last Edit: December 10, 2014, 11:05:12 PM by the leveller »


email
 
Share this topic...
In a forum
(BBCode)
In a site/blog
(HTML)



COMODO SECURE

Powered by EzPortal
Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 
Comodo SSL