Further update on trial of Peter Anthony Hofschroer

  • 0 Replies
  • 2606 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Offline the leveller

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • 4111
  • +75/-0
Further update on trial of Peter Anthony Hofschroer
« on: July 24, 2015, 09:05:08 PM »
FOR THE PERSONAL ATTENTION OF THE PRESIDING  JUDGE OF THE NORTH EASTERN CIRCUIT
The Honourable Mr Justice Henry Brian Globe.
"Janaury 2015"?

What on earth is going on here?

Norman Scarth,

Associate & Hon. Sec. of

The Article 6 Group,

Athlone, Republic of Ireland


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:38:48 +0100
Subject: RE: YorkCrwnCt. PeterH.FoI request. T20140525

 
Mr Scarth

 

Further to your email below, please note that the case for Mr Hofschroer has only been taken out of the list for Monday 27th today. 

The new date fixed for this trial is now the 4th Janaury 2015 

(Janaury!!!  2015???) and is listed to be heard at Teeside Crown Court. The reason the case has been put back is following an application to adjourn by the Defence due to issues with reports required, unavailability of Counsel and the increase in length of the trial.  There are 39 charges of Making Indecent photographs of a child. The firm representating Mr Hofschroer is Peace Legal of Barnsley Road, Wombwell, Barnsley. 

 

Regards

Chantal Hooson

Operational Team Leader

York Crown Court


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Norman Scarth [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 23 July 2015 14:32
To: York Crown, Enquiries
Cc: Norman Scarth
Subject: YorkCrwnCt. PeterH.FoI request. T20140525









To: Miss C Hooson

Operational Team Leader

York Crown Court.  Case No. T20140525




We have been disturbed, worried & suspicious at receiving neither reply nor acknowledgment to our questions of 7th May 2015, or the reminder sent on 11th May (lower down).

We are even more disturbed now, & accordingly ask the questions below under the FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT.   

We understood the trial of Mr Peter Hofschroer was due to start on 27th July 2015, & is expected to last a week or more. 

We NOW understand that the start has been postponed until some date in the future. 

Will you please inform us

(a) The date on which it will start? 

(b) The reason why it has been set back? 

(The courts are supposed to be 'Open to All', but they are not 'open' if people wishing to attend a trial are given conflicting information about when it is to take place.  This is especially important for people living far away, who need to make travel arrangements in advance.  Some may already have done so, & thus wasted substantial sums of money.  We are particularly worried that the reason for postponement is an ulterior one, with the INTENTION of reducing the number of people attending!)

The following questions were asked of you earlier, but were ignored. 

We now ask them under the Freedom of Information Act: 

(c) What are the charges against Mr Hofschroer?. 

(d).  What reasons were given for refusing bail for Mr Hofschroer?

(e)  What are the names & contact details  of the lawyers representing Mr Hofschroer?  We need these as some of us have information which would help in the Defence.

We ask you to treat this matter as urgent, & reply by return, rather than delaying to the maximum allowed by the Freedom of Information Act.


From

The Article 6 Group.

Athlone, Republic of Ireland.

Norman scarth, Associate & Hon. Sec.   




: [email protected]

To: [email protected]
Subject: T20140525. Reminder to Miss Hooson.
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 11:52:50 +0100

 
A reminder.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subject: T20140525. PH. 5/5/15? Miss Hooson.
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 11:40:18 +0100

 

To: Miss C Hooson

Operational Team Leader

York Crown Court.

From THE ARTICLE 6 GROUP.

Dear Miss Hooson,

Re. case No. T20140525, Regina v Peter Hofschroer.

We understand Mr Hofschroer was due to appear before York Crown Court on 5th May 2015, for a 'Plea & Directions' hearing.

Would you please inform us if the hearing took place, & if so, whether the prosecution is continuing?  If so, what were the specific charges, & what decisions were made,

If the prosecution is continuing, & if bail was not granted, would you please inform us what reasons (if any) were given for refusing bail?

If Mr Hofschroer had legal representation, would you please give us contact details whereby we can get in touch with them?

Thanking you in anticipation.


From

Norman Scarth,

Athlone, Republic of Ireland.

Associate & Hon. Sec. of The Article 6 Group.

(The Group is composed of lawyers & other who are concerned about the rapid decline of Britain into an Orwellian Police State).


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [email protected]
To: ag[email protected]
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 12:27:23 +0000
Subject: RE: T20140525. PH. A fair hearing? Oaths: Judicial & Sovereign's.


Mr Scarth

Please note that Mr Hofschroer is before York Crown Court on charges of Making Indecent Images, for which he has Legal Representation. The number of charges that will potentially go to Trial can not be confirmed until after the next hearing on the 12th February 2015.

 Regards

 Miss C Hooson

Operational Team Leader

York Crown Court


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Norman Scarth [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 03 February 2015 15:29
To: York Crown, Enquiries
Subject: T20140525. PH. A fair hearing? Oaths: Judicial & Sovereign's.




 
From THE ARTICLE 6 GROUP.
To:  Whichever judge will be presiding at the next hearing relating to whatever charges there may be against Mr Peter Hofschroer, which we understand are under case number T20140525.

(There are many disturbing aspects of the treatment of Mr Hofschroer, particularly the methods used to prevent his Private Prosecution  going ahead.  Compounding them is the lack of 'open justice', in that there has been no response from York Crown Court Office to our question [highlighted below] about the charges against him .) 

We respectfully remind you of your own Judicial Oath, "To Act Without Fear or Favour, Affection or Ill-will, According to the Laws & Usages of This Realm", & that of The Sovereign, in whose name you act, "... To Deliver JUSTICE with MERCY". 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -  -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --

'Affection or Ill-will'?  It is a regrettable fact that that 'Ill-will' against the Litigant In Person (& more so against the Private Prosecutor) is endemic throughout the legal profession, & does not always disappear when the lawyer swears the Judicial Oath. Mr Hofschroer is a Litigant in person AND a Private Prosecutor.  We ask that you make a conscious effort to guard against any 'ill-will' within yourself.   

'Laws & Usages'?  It is a regrettable fact that in recent years, some 'Laws' have been introduced (notably by the Blair Regime) which are in direct contradiction of the Sovereign's Oath quoted above.   We respectfully suggest that where there is contradiction or conflict, the Sovereign's Oath should be paramount.   

But now to 'Usages':  The contradiction here is even more dramatic!  In days gone by, when comparatively minor offences were alleged, the person would be brought to court by means of a Summons, delivered by post, police action only necessary if the person Summoned failed to turn up.   How different now!   
Quite unnecessarily, with great waste of police manpower & public money, police are not only brought into play, but do so in a heavy-handed, Stazi-like fashion.  Excessive numbers of police will take the alleged wrongdoer by surprise, pounce on him, snap handcuffs on & drag him off to some Lubyanka. 

In Mr Hofschoer's case it was done when he attended at York Magistrates' Court for the first hearing of his Private Prosecution, for which Summonses had been issued (& served, as described above).  To arrest Mr Hofschroer BEFORE the hearing, thus preventing him progressing the Private Prosecution was as blatant a case of 'Perverting the Course of Justice' as it is possible to imagine.  It was obvious that 'SOMEONE' was determined the prosecution would not go ahead.   If the arrest HAD to take place, it could just as easily have been done after the hearing. 

Having come to England specifically to progress his Private Prosecution, it was hardly likely he would abscond.   To deny him bail, put him in prison, denying him access to his computer & paper documents needed for his Private Prosecution (& to defend himself against whatever charges there may be against him) is another blatant example of Perverting the Course of Justice.

In the treatment meted out to Mr Hofschroer there is little sign of either Justice OR  Mercy.

From

Norman Scarth,

Associate & Hon. Sec. of The Article 6 Group.

(The Group is composed of lawyers & other who are concerned about the rapid decline of Britain into an Orwellian Police State).


 
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]; et al.
Subject: T20140525. Hofschroer. Charges?
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 07:42:09 +0000

 

To: Debbie Mitchinson
Administration Officer
York Crown Court
Tele 01904 645121

Dear Debbie Mitchison,
SURELY it must be unlawful for a person to be held in prison for weeks (as Mr Hofschroer is), without charges? (Other than in a Police State)   
And  now to be transferred to a prison 200 mile away (known as 'ghosting'), when the case against him (whatever it is), AND his own Private Prosecution are both in York?   
If there ARE charges against him, you MUST know what they are.  Would you please tell us. 

Also why there should be such a shocking waste of taxpayers' money, both in holding him in prison when he is obviously no danger to the public, AND  transport to HMP Wandsworth & back again to York, which we presume will happen? 

Though the happening in York Magistrates' Court on 1st December 2014 is not within your emit, it SHOULD be of concern to those who receive this Cc.

There was most blatant 'Perverting the Course of Justice' by those who arrested Peter Hofschroer BEFORE the hearing of his Private Prosecution, when they could quite easily have waited until after.  It was obviously to prevent the Private Prosecution going ahead.   Just one more example of how Private Prosecutors are obstructed by those who purport to be the 'Forces of Law & Order'.

Norman Scarth,

Associate & Honorary Secretary of The Article 6 Group.

Athlone, Republic of Ireland. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Hofschroer, Case T20140525. Not arraigned?
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 20:26:33 +0000

 
To: Debbie Mitchinson
Administration Officer
York Crown Court
Tele 01904 645121
 
Your response & information is much appreciated. Thank you.
If Mr Hofschroer was 'not arraigned',  could you please tell me why he has been remanded in custody? 
My limited understanding of the law is that 'Bail' should always be given, unless there are good reasons for refusing it.   Could you please tell me what reasons (if any) were given for refusing bail to Mr Hofschroer?
Norman Scarth.   
 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 16:56:13 +0000
Subject: RE: Hofschroer, Case T20140525
 

Dear Mr Scarth

 

Thank you for your e-mail.  I can confirm that Mr Hofshroer’s case was in Court on 15th December for a Preliminary hearing. It has been listed for a further Plea and Case Management hearing on 12.2.15 with a potential trial date of 19.5.15.  As Mr Hofschoer was not arraigned I cannot confirm the charges at this stage.

Yours sincerely

 

Debbie Mitchinson
Administration Officer
York Crown Court
Tele 01904 645121




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


From: Norman Scarth [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 17 December 2014 19:07
To: York Crown, Enquiries
Subject: Hofschroer, Case T20140525

 


I understand that Mr Peter Anthony Hofschroer was to appear in Court 1 at York Crown Court on Monday 15th December 2014, case number T20140525.
Could you please inform me what was the charge, whether the hearing did take place, & if so, what was the result of the hearing,
Norman Scarth,
Athlone,
Republic of Ireland. .
 
This email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisations IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

 


 
Share this topic...
In a forum
(BBCode)
In a site/blog
(HTML)


SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk