March of the zealots

  • 0 Replies
  • 572 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Offline the leveller

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • 4115
  • +75/-0
March of the zealots
« on: March 19, 2017, 06:25:01 PM »
Some information for you all, hopefully not too long:
 
This is a link to the PDF in attachment “March of the Zealots” by John Brignell from 2008.
http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/zealots.htm
 
When you have read the paragraphs below, will you, like me, be left asking the question about our own White Genocide in Britain, aided and abetted by the Marxist Common Purpose BBC, tame media and our own government FCO, and why the White Native population is being deliberately black washed, and ignored in the justice system, which seems weighted in favour of non indigenous people, and against native white people?
 
I believe we are now in the deepest throws of this abominable movement, which is using the UN and NGOs (Non Governmental Organisations) and tame media to decide government policies, funded by rich people of the kind like George Soros, who favour a New World Order totalitarian world government, run by a few unelected elite Marxist dictators.
 
Haven’t you ever wondered, how these protesters seem to spring into action fully formed and prepared, with professional looking placards, and clothing etc?
 
It is all being orchestrated using Hegelian Dialectic tactics (cause the problem – wait until there is a huge clamouring for action – then offer a solution that you wanted in the first place, but the people would not have accepted otherwise = Problem-Reaction-Solution).
 
While in office Tony Blair travelled far and wide promoting NGOs, and we are now seeing the fruits of his labours coming home to roost with rabid, screaming Marxist mobs of NGOs shouting down any opposition to the NWO plans, instead of discussing the problems rationally.
 
Islamic people use the same tactics to get their own way, using the very convenient Race, Equality and Human Rights laws.
 
Tony Blair also tried to get the UN to adopt a policy called R2P (Responsibility to Protect), which allowed any country to intervene in another country’s affairs, if it thought the people needed protecting from it’s rulers.
      In September 2005, at the United Nations World Summit, all Member States formally accepted the responsibility of each State to protect its population from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.
 
Definition
The Responsibility to Protect is a political commitment unanimously adopted by all members of the United Nations General Assembly at the 2005 World Summit and articulated in paragraphs 138-139 of the 2005 World Summit Outcome Document:
138. Each individual State has the responsibility to protect its populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. This responsibility entails the prevention of such crimes, including their incitement, through appropriate and necessary means. We accept that responsibility and will act in accordance with it. The international community should, as appropriate, encourage and help States to exercise this responsibility and support the United Nations in establishing an early warning capability.
139. The international community, through the United Nations, also has the responsibility to use appropriate diplomatic, humanitarian and other peaceful means, in accordance with Chapters VI and VIII of the Charter, to help protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. In this context, we are prepared to take collective action, in a timely and decisive manner, through the Security Council, in accordance with the Charter, including Chapter VII, on a case-by-case basis and in cooperation with relevant regional organizations as appropriate, should peaceful means be inadequate and national authorities manifestly fail to protect their populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. We stress the need for the General Assembly to continue consideration of the responsibility to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity and its implications, bearing in mind the principles of the Charter and international law. We also intend to commit ourselves, as necessary and appropriate, to helping States build capacity to protect their populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity and to assisting those which are under stress before crises and conflicts break out.
140. We fully support the mission of the Special Advisor of the Secretary-General on the Prevention of Genocide.
The above paragraphs in the 2005 World Summit Outcome Document serve as the basis for the inter-governmental agreement to the Responsibility to Protect. The General Assembly adopted the 2005 World Summit Outcome Document in its resolution 60/1 of 2005.[24] The body subsequently committed to
continue consideration of the Responsibility to Protect with its Resolution A/Res/63/308 of October 2009.[25] The UN
Security Council first reaffirmed the Responsibility to Protect in Resolution 1674 (2006) on the protection of civilians in armed conflict, recalling in particular paragraphs 138 and 139 of the Summit Outcome regarding the responsibility to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.[26]
 
      The Responsibility to Protect (R2P or RtoP) is a proposed norm that sovereignty is not an absolute right, and that states forfeit aspects of their sovereignty when they fail to protect their populations from mass atrocity crimes and human rights violations (namely genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and ...
     The Responsibility to Protect (R2P or RtoP) is a global political commitment which was endorsed by all member states of the United Nations at the 2005 World Summit to prevent genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.
       Humanitarian intervention has been defined as a state's use of "military force against another state when the chief publicly declared aim of that military action is ending human-rights violations being perpetrated by the state against which it is directed."
      The International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS) was an ad hoc commission of participants which in 2001 worked to popularize the concept of humanitarian intervention and democracy-restoring intervention under the name of "Responsibility to protect."
 
regards
Jane


 
Share this topic...
In a forum
(BBCode)
In a site/blog
(HTML)


SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk