‘K’ IN BRITAIN IS A TREASONABLE FAD    

  • 0 Replies
  • 737 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Offline the leveller

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • 4125
  • +75/-0
‘K’ IN BRITAIN IS A TREASONABLE FAD    
« on: July 10, 2017, 07:29:23 PM »
‘K’ IN BRITAIN IS A TREASONABLE FAD
 
 
Have you noticed the stylish fad of using ‘K’ when describing distance ? 
(“I cycled 36K today”.  “Rubbish.  You never cycled 36000 miles”. )
UK distances are measured in miles.  It’s the law.  People who use ‘K’ are trying to appear “super cool” (whatever that is) but end up showing their arrogant ignorance because nobody else understands.
 
Actually it’s TREASON.  It attempts to confirm foreign rule against the interests of the British people.
 
Surveys show that more than 90% of British people object to metrication and reject it outright. Metric was never lawfully introduced in the UK and the law is to use imperial measurement. Anyone who considers themselves British uses imperial because they are lawfully abiding British, as are the measurements.
 
All the cycling clubs, running clubs, ramblers and all the charities they support with funding, use ‘K’ as a fashion statement as if it actually means something.  The event distances not being in miles are not official. You could have a 15 банан race of a 30 банан race. Neither means anything.
 
Trying to appear stylish, pro-Euro and progressive, they copy events like the Tours de France as the Tours de Northern England and call it a European event so must therefore be measured in ‘K’ (kilometres).  WRONG AGAIN.  Because they’re held in Britain, the events are British and must be in UK miles.
 
‘K’ (kilometres) is not a recognised dimension in the UK. It is used as yet another way to promote destruction of Britain. Metric is illegal because it was never agreed by the people, they were never asked, and it was never legally introduced.
 
Read the attached. 
 
Caroline B
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE ABSURDITY OF BRITAIN’S METRICATION
This is a matter of national importance.  Of serious criminality and of law.
Surveys show that 90% of British people are angry at Britain’s metrication against their will. For centuries, Britain led the world with well thought-out imperial measurements.  Their convenient size, simple whole numbers and instantly relatable measures however, are being energetically derided by Europhiles as clumsy and old fashioned when the world has itself far preferred imperial’s better qualities and refused to adopt the metrication political agenda unless enforced by tyranny and despotism.
Contrary to law we are being forced, to our detriment, to accept poorly conceived, inferior foreign standards.  It is as consequential as being compelled to give up our English language and what is not realised by many is that Britain’s metrication is not about “easing trade with Europe” as we are expected to believe.  That is a conveniently contrived lie. Told we must be metric in order to trade with Europe, we have successfully traded with the world for centuries (and the world with us) using imperial measurement which many nations have preferred and benefited from and continue to choose. The real purpose of metrication is to remove imperial measurement as yet another step in eliminating the English as a people.
Just as mass immigration, it is part of a covert programme of genocide against the British by attacking our cultural structure, indoctrination of our young and destabilising the nation by dividing and setting rival groups. It is part of the calculated destruction of our English society because it obstructs subjugation and total foreign rule. Just like immigration, it is planned cultural replacement by stealth.
Britain’s metrication also has to do with the purposeful dumbing-down of society.  Where for centuries, man has successfully worked with nature’s multiples of 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 16, his mental capacity is being intentionally degraded to a primitive aptitude with multiples only of 10.  As one headteacher put it,“It is a serious insult to our children and abuse of their thinking capability to deliberately limit their mental agility by imposing such a restricting system of measurement as metrication”(Daily Telegraph).  Many parents, apparently, agree.
Does it not occur to you that Britain’s metrication was never offered for public consideration? It is imposed with a religious fervour by public servants presuming to be lord and master, conspiring in an illegal agenda against their own people.  That in itself is treason quite apart from metrication being treasonable contrary to English law as we shall see below.
At her Coronation in 1953, Her Majesty the Queen solemnly undertook to uphold and protect English Constitutional and Common Law and the customs of the United Kingdom and the then Empire.  The Queen cannot change those laws and customs as she is herself subject to them.  What she cannot do, her servants in parliament also cannot do.  That a succession of parliaments since the early 1970’s has sought to impose metrication in Britain contrary to
2
those protected laws and customs means that besides acting criminally contrary to law and custom, each of those officials has placed themselves above the Queen.  That in turn means that they imagine the death of the Queen.  Both of these are acts of the most serious treason contrary to the 1351 Treason Act and 1848 Treason Felony Act.
Britain’s metrication is thus treasonable on two counts.  Treason contrary to the laws themselves and treason in the manner of its introduction beyond those officials’ authority. Imperial weights and measures for all purposes protected by English Constitutional and Common Law were expressly authorised years earlier by Parliament in Westminster.  No amending Act has ever been introduced.  British industry refused to adopt metrication until criminally threatened with prosecution and certain imprisonment.  Even now, a large majority of British business desires return to imperial measure for is much greater practicality, functionality and immediate application to all requirements.  Industry is forced however, to act illegally and to oblige its British customers to do so as well.  The Metric Martyrs (http://www.metricmartyrs.co.uk/) lost their court battle to use imperial weights and measures solely because of treasonous governmental chicanery and manipulation. Britain will never be a “metric” nation Despite the proclaimed importance and necessity for metrication, Britain is never likely to become a metric nation.  Critically, the people do not consent.  Survey results repeatedly show they reject metrication as “inferior, restricting, inflexible, problematic, unfit for daily purpose” and “of limited utility”.  Ask any person on the street.  They instinctively know their height, weight and approximate distance from home in English imperial measurement.  A vast majority of those taught metrication in school even, do not know what those are in metric units and choose imperial measurement over metric anyway.
Our roads, distances and road signs will never become metric.  The financial and political cost of conversion is far too colossal for any government ever to consider risking its electoral reputation for such an unpopular matter.  The United States, too, will never be metric for all the same reasons and American people reject metrication just as strongly.  In Canada, metrication proved so unpopular that the Government backed down and reinstated people’s freedom to choose imperial measurement.  Australian and other English speaking peoples also choose imperial despite governments’ claims otherwise.  Many “metric” nations use metric units in imperial quantities because only those suit life’s needs.  Metric units do not.
The argument that Britain must adopt international measurement standards is unfounded. There is nointernational standard.  Every metric nation uses a slightly different version while many of their people use imperial instead.  So while nations in their nationalism reject the international principle, their populations for reason of practicality still choose imperial.  The world-leading German optics industry, for example, pay lip-service to metrication as European law demands but they convert all their calculations into imperial units for greater utility.
International law, moreover, demands that all aviation and sea going measurements be imperial.  The metre can never replace altitudes in feet as radio communication dictates the simple clarity of whole round numbers and practical flying height above ground level cannot be divided into the necessary range of safely separated altitudes, quadrantal cruise levels and flight levels when the metre is much too cumbersome for such precision.
The Absurdity of Britain’s Metrication
3
All air and sea distances are in nautical miles, yards, feet and inches and quantities are in ounces and pounds, tons, pints, quarts and gallons.  Note the generally monosyllabic nature of these for radio communication clarity.  Aviation fuel is measured in pounds compatible with aircraft weight and balance calculation and all aircraft instrumentation is in imperial as is air traffic control.  Cloud cover is quantified in oktas (eighths).  Imperial units are chosen universally for their practicality and application.  The metric accounting system is unsuitable as it is workable only in 10s.
The majority of those in Britain who use metric measurement terms do so not out of conscious choice but because they have been deceitfully made to believe it fashionable or obligatory by law.  What they do not realise, is that fashions are often impractical and short lived frequently for some arbitrary frame of mind, that the nation as a whole rejects metrication and that there is no law that requires it.  If the metric system offered the claimed improvement over traditional measurement, then it will have been eagerly adopted across the world long ago.  But it has not.  The millions of the world’s people have consistently rejected it.  Why ? Because it offers only obstruction in people’s lives. Problems with the metric system An arbitrary construct arising from anxiety during the French Revolution, the metre was conceived by the very people who tried to abolish the Christian calendar and even Christianity itself.  In their obsession to reduce every quantity to ten, they have never succeeded in decimalising time, the Christian calendar, angles or the degrees in a circle.  Metrication as a system did not receive the depth of serious consideration for its practicality as did imperial measurement.  Nature does not conform to man’s contrivances and even space and the planet we inhabit have from time immemorial, been measurable in multiples of six squared. For its base 10 principle, metrication is a system of accounting not measuring.  Life’s dimensions, unfortunately, do not obey this strict principle of measurement in 10s and there is even doubt as to its suitability in science where many regard it prone to disastrous error and purely a political expedience to progress bureaucratic meddling.
Metrication suffers intractable problems.  Unlike imperial, it offers too few units each of ill conceived, impractical size.  This involves unduly complex numbers frequently necessitating decimal fractions for accuracy whose decimal point is easily misplaced (catastrophic in medicine and science), unseen or omitted altogether.  Long number strings are in any case, off-putting and far from easy to scale or mentally calculate.  Unlike imperial, its units have no readily identifiable reference in the world or relationship with man’s existence on Earth. This means their dimensions are unrelatable unlike imperial’s instantly recognised parts of the human anatomy or commonplace articles for immediate assessment, appreciation and ease of communication.
Whether one accepts the metre as being one ten-millionth part of the distance from the North Pole to the Equator along the Paris Meridian at sea level (how did they ever measure that precisely ?), or the length of the path travelled by light in a vacuum during a time interval of 1/299,792,458 of a second, it is actually meaningless.  Neither can be visualized much less offer any kind of perception.  The most recent incarnation of the metre as declared by the International Committee for Weights and Measures is as a “unit of proper length” whose definition is restricted to “lengths ℓ which are sufficiently short for the effects predicted by
The Absurdity of Britain’s Metrication
4
general relativity to be negligible with respect to the uncertainties of realisation”.  But still the metre cannot be readily identified.  The imperial foot can  -  and has for millennia.
As standard divisions on scales and rulers, the inch is divided into 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 48, 50 and 64 for instant application and accuracy.  The metre offers only 10ths (centimetres) and 100ths (millimetres).  Ask yourself which is more useful.  These metric terms are not just excessively wordy, but 10ths and 100ths are not particularly practical with life’s countless sizes.  So for fine measurement, you invariably end up with decimal fractions because the metric scale does not lend itself to the task.
Perhaps not surprisingly, some modern rulers and scales offer inches only in 10ths on one edge and centimetres and millimetres on the other as if this choice satisfied every possible measuring requirement.  It cannot and rarely does.  The two are entirely incompatible so one is left struggling with imagined parts of either.  This would suggest an ill-considered political decision as the frequently used 1/32 of an inch is finer than the millimetre and would more practicably associate directly with the inches edge as a workable system. When using imperial, how sensible is it to base every measurement from several miles down to a matter of inches, on the yard (3 feet) ?  Did you assess every weight as a decimal fraction of not quite two and a quarter pounds and did you measure liquid in multiples of less than a quart (quarter of a gallon) ?  How practical was it to use (say) “0.762 yard” (30 inches, the standard door width) instead of simply saying “2 foot 6” or even “2-6” ?  A standard door is 2-6 by 6-6.
When did you ever measure empty space (oven size, car boot size) in gallons ?  We used width, breadth and depth which gainfully conveyed something to us, or maybe cubic measure. The metric procedure quantifies volume by liquid equivalent  -  which conveys little and cannot be visualised.  Just how big is a 20 litre oven ?  How often did you consider that your airliner was flying at the standardised flight level of 10666.6 yards (32,000 feet) ?  Why are imperial measurements the international choice ?  Because they are practical, appropriately sized, use simple whole numbers, are easily to  mentally calculate and have considerable utility.
Metrication’s few measures are all impractical.  A kilo of produce is far more than people want.  The English pound was designed to be well suited.  There is no viable metric unit in use between centimetres and metres.  We usefully have inches, feet and yards, all interrelating, designed for a variety of purposes and identifiable yet distinct for life’s ranges of size.  There is nothing between metres and kilometres.  We benefit from yards, furlongs (traditionally in horse racing) and fathoms at sea and very conveniently, standard simple quarters or halves of a mile.  And there is nothing between kilograms and tonnes.  We have ounces, pounds, stones, hundredweights and tons for every conceivable range of weight.
All imperial units offer instant application in simple whole numbers for any size or purpose. Metrication involves large and anomalous complex numbers in too few units often requiring a decimal point easily omitted, misplaced or unseen.  It is not so simple or instant to work with.  What is so telling, however, is that many metric sizes and quantities in use throughout the world are in complex part units that approximate to the imperial sizes that life demands. So the imperial measures were right all along then  - and they use simple whole numbers.
Another frequent decimalisation problem is that it cannot use imperial’s simple whole round numbers.  Has it ever occurred to you that the imperial system was conceived to provide a
The Absurdity of Britain’s Metrication
5
measure size suited to every quantifying need while allowing simple whole round numbers for instant comparison, mental calculation and communication ?  You cannot do these things with metric units.  Though metrication has been taught in schools to satisfy the pro-metric lobbyists, it is interesting to note that even the Prime Minister has recognised and demanded the importance of our children learning the imperial measures as the lawful and most sensible system of measurement.
Unbelievably, we now find the “apolitical” BBC and other TV companies and producers using their unthinkable and unlawful political influence to improperly sponsor and impose metrication upon unsuspecting viewers in public broadcast and websites.  Not only that, but they presume to instruct independent TV producers in this illegal activity and the general public as to the metric measures they must customarily, and illegally, use.  As the British people reject metrication, this is outright treason.  Yet such is the BBC’s understanding of British measurement that we are told the imperial yard (36 inches) is greater than the metre (39.370 inches).
From wherever around the world they report, TV companies insist upon giving every measurement in metric units presumably to emphasise the “foreignness” of the location completely ignoring that British people do not understand, indeedrefuse to understand, these foreign terms so glibly foist upon them.  In TV programmes and films we are now given dimensions in metric units even though few people understand them and they convey nothing to us.  Just so long as it is in metric, is all that matters.
It is not beyond the wit of man to realise that British viewers (and indeed many others) expect imperial units they understand and which will convey something of meaning.  To convert metric to imperial for people’s comprehension is a very simple act for producers to undertake and is surely part of the broadcasting service they are paid for.  Why not otherwise do away with English and broadcast programmes from other countries in their native tongue ?  Many viewers, apparently, simply change channels as programme value has gone and all trust and confidence in the broadcasting companies’ service is thereafter lost.
We also find that TV companies ridiculously believe it shrewd to use miles for large distances in Britain but metres for everything else.  First, two entirely incompatible systems cannot work together.  There is no correlation or continuity.  Assessing metric measurements with miles becomes impossible.  Second, it demonstrates a gratuitous determination to pursue the metric political campaign regardless of sense or logic, with no thought for the confusion and hostility it causes, or the obscuring of information offered and loss of public trust.  In this manner, moreover, companies unmistakably advertise themselves as serial law breakers. NOW THE LEGAL PART. Lawyers these days are not trained or versed in English Constitutional and Common Law. Thus few comprehend that these laws actually exist, remain in force as written or that crimes against them are routinely committed.  Such crime therefore goes unrecognised, unheeded and consequently becomes “acceptable” behaviour.  This is why society is so insensible and lawless and it is why foreign (European Napoleonic) law is so casually imported and allowed to freely prevail in Britain’s judicial system.
Treason is historically an important part of English law.  It is why many laws were written in the first place.  These English laws, importantly, are immutable and in perpetuity. They
The Absurdity of Britain’s Metrication
6
cannot be altered, repealed or ignored by Government and they were written specifically to forever protect British people from despotic governance.  Even the Queen cannot change these laws as she is herself subject to them.  What she cannot do, herservants in Parliament also cannot do.
Treason is betrayal or breach of faith against the will or the interests of the person or the nation.  In speech, intent or action, it is disloyalty or to violate one’s allegiance or obligation to another, to one’s own people and thus to one’s country in support of any other principle, state, power or authority.  It carries very serious penalties.
To use or represent the metric system in Britain as the accepted legal standard British units of measurement is to undermine and mislead the British public mind.  Most commonly found in government services and British TV broadcasting, its use is to influence the nation into believing that Britain has accepted and adopted this alien system of measurement when in fact, the people flatly reject it.  To undermine or mislead the British nation against its will is a serious offence.  It is TREASON.
Imperial weights and measures for all purposes are protected by English Constitutional and Common Law.  They have been expressly authorised in law by the British Parliament in Westminster.  No amending Act has ever been introduced.  No law, ruling or edict exists that requires Britain’s metrication.  No White or Green Paper, political party manifesto, Queen’s speech, parliamentary legislative programme or popular mandate has ever suggested that Britain should or would adopt the metric system.
The imperial scales therefore remain the lawful standard British measurement system in official and exclusive use in this country, required and protected by law. BY LAW.  Nothing else is legal or permitted.
The government inspired mantra “The UK took the decision to adopt the metric system in 1965” has been clearly exposed as the deliberate lie that it is.  It was contrived for political purpose and is widely known as “the Myth of 1965”. The UK has never “decided” to adopt metrication.  The public have never been consulted.  Their agreement or consent has never been sought, let alone given and metrication has never been debated in Parliament.  The myth arises solely from the personalhopeof two 1960’s pro-Europe civil servants and Harold Wilson’s failed sop to the French who refused UK admission to the EEC anyway.  These do not justify, legalise or authorise Britain’s metrication against people’s will.
Britain is not and has never been part of the European Union.  Metrication therefore has no claimed purpose.
When he signed the European Communities Act in 1972, Prime Minister Edward Heath knowingly and wilfully tricked, deceived and betrayedthe British people into foreign rule by the EEC/EU. He deliberately lied to the country.  For that reason alone under English Law, the 1972 Act is void and of no effect.  His was the most calculating and grievous treason in British history. He gave away his country. Upon signing, his treasonous act instantly removed him from lawful office and it failed to become legally binding because treason has no legitimacy and cannot do that. You cannot make law by breaking the law. His then treasonous government immediately became an unlawful assembly as a treasonous government is not lawful and has no legitimacy.
The Absurdity of Britain’s Metrication
7
No parliament can bind a successor.  But no following parliament has ever reversed Heath’s treachery.  Instead, every following prime minister and parliament has consciously and deliberately lied to reinforce Heath’s outrageous pretence that Britain had knowingly and willingly consented to foreign rule.  As public servants, neither he nor they ever had such authority and their actions are highly treasonous for conspiring against the nation’s known interests, intention to surrender its sovereignty, using wilful deception to deliberately betray the nation and for acting in the political interests of a foreign power. It is effectively to declare war on the British Crown and the nation which is treason contrary to the 1351 Treason Act and the Treason Felony Act 1848.
Every parliament since Heath’s therefore, is and has been an unlawful assembly.  With no legitimacy and in knowingly committing the most evil act of treason against their own people, each has invited and imposed foreign rule over their own country.  Since 1972, not one has acted within the law.  Having solemnly sworn lifetime oaths of loyalty and allegiance to serve and to protect Britain, each has conspired in this treason and they persist in deceitfully concealing the truth of their illicit activities from the public as it has always been known that the British people would object most violently were they ever to find out.
But theyarefinding out. Parliaments’ treason and corruption is a matter of public record with an increasing number of research documents, newspaper and magazine articles, TV documentaries and an overwhelming amount of Foreign and Commonwealth Office documentary evidence released to the public domain.  Over 600 pages of it can be downloaded and read athttp://www.englishconstitutiongroup.org/downloads/treason-relateddownloads/ and this evidence is also verified in Hansard with a full and complete record of politicians’ statements.
No law or other binding obligation can result from treason or intent by an unlawful assembly. English law and supremacy of the imperial system of measurement therefore, remain as they were prior to signing of the 1972 Act.  That means that just as before 1972, metric measurements have no place whatsoever in Britain.  It also means that Britain is not and has never been part of the European Union as every Act and EU Treaty since 1972 whether or not given the Royal Assent is treasonous, unlawful, null and void.  So too, is any attempted standard use of the metric scales in Britain, even as metric equivalents to imperial quantities. It is illegal.
As a further consequence, the European Union has no lawful influence in Britain whatsoever. Neither does its Napoleonic European Law.  Their authority exist only in the minds of certain politicians of whose criminal actions the public are already very well aware.  In any case, the outright supremacy of English law automatically intercedes and strikes down any attempt to repeal, subvert, overrule or replace it.  The pretence of European authority and influence and of metrication is pure theatre and make-believe designed at the highest levels of Westminster to deceive and subjugate Britain to foreign rule against the people’s will for others’ political purpose contrary to law.  It is WILFUL TREASON. A succession of unlawful British parliaments therefore, having no legitimacy, illegally and without mandate, wilfully and criminally import and impose upon their own people, foreign rule and influence that have no force of law in Britain. This criminality includes such unlawful documents as the Weights and Measures Act 1985, the Metric Regulations 1994 and all EEC/EU Regulations and Directives, all of which are
The Absurdity of Britain’s Metrication
8
null and void so far as Britain is concerned.  Not one has the force of law as each was brought by an unlawful assembly of government ministers having no legitimacy (thus could not enact legislation) in the clear parliamentary knowledge that it was treasonable contrary to English Constitutional and Common Law.  Though the Weights and Measures Act 1985 was relied upon as the authority in the metric martyrs case and others, such legislation while held to be rightful at the time, never had legitimacy or force of law.  And as Chief Justice Beresford of the Common Pleas ruled,“There is no such thing as a bad law for if it is bad it is not law”.
Metrication in Britain then, is based solely upon the deliberately contrived lie that “The UK took the decision to adopt the metric system in 1965” when in fact the people knew nothing about it, would never have consented and have been knowingly and purposely deceived and betrayed by those paid to serve them and who have each solemnly sworn oaths of loyalty and allegiance to serve and to protect the security of the British nation.
For the avoidance of any doubt, all of the above is historical fact.  It is evidenced in public documentary record and is acknowledged by the Attorney General, the Lord Chancellor, the Lord Chief Justice and others. This knowledge also exists in living public memory, press and TV coverage recorded for all time in public archives and much of it has been referred in treason reports by members of the public to numerous police forces that have accepted the evidence as prima facie cases to answer with a view to prosecuting action being taken.
Britain’s metrication is directly contrary to the 1351 Treason Act, the 1559 Act of Supremacy, the Declaration and Bill of Rights 1689 and the Treason Felony Act 1848 among others. These laws are beyond the reach of Parliament to amend, repeal or to disregard and just because modern day lawyers are not trained in these laws does not mean they do not exist or that serious offences against them have not been and are not, committed.  Under the Act of Settlement 1700 S4, these major Constitutional and Common Laws are the birthright of the people.  Supremacy of imperial measurement in Britain, protected and required by these laws, is thus the birthright of the people and cannot be removed.  Acknowledged in law for all purposes by Parliament, no amending Act has every been introduced.  Only imperial measurement may be used in Britain. Realising the truth Not only is Britain’s metrication entirely contrary to law, but the people flatly refuse to accept it.  It serves no gainful purpose and is far from any improvement over imperial.  It is a political intent criminally and enthusiastically imposed by uncompromising Europhiles not seeing that the true purpose of this Frankfurt School subversion technique is to remove yet another part their own culture for ulterior motive not in our interests  -  the collective consequences of which even their own families will have to live with.  They ardently pursue its adoption and are quick to put down anyone who disagrees.  Thus they wantonly encourage the commission of treason against the British nation  -  their own children’s rapidly diminishing inheritance.
If metrication had offered the advantages claimed, then it will have been eagerly adopted around the world without need for such tyrannical imposition and ongoing attempts to convince of its benefits.  Hundreds of millions of the world’s people cannot all be wrong in their rejection of it.
Born of the 18th Century French notion that everything on Earth should unworkably conform to units of 10, it ignores nature’s laws of 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 16.  Is the structure of crystals
The Absurdity of Britain’s Metrication
9
decimal ?  Is the structure of snowflakes decimal ?  Imperial measurements were conceived specifically to relate directly with nature and man’s existence on Earth using practical everyday measures of relatable dimension in instantly scalable simple whole numbers. Metrication’s 10’s can do none of those things.  Even worse than its few impractical units, its greatest unforeseen downfall perhaps, is its decimal point so catastrophic if lost, left out or disastrously misplaced.
With no physical reference, metric measures convey nothing relatable.  They are arbitrary and imaginary.  Ridiculed by metriphiles as “awkward and antiquated” on the other hand, imperial measurement given the world by Britain, has single-handedly enabled man’s every refinement in life including construction, manufacture, industry, scientific progress, micro electronics, internet technology, medical advancement and manned exploration of space. It brings considerable advantage over metrication’s poorly conceived inadequacies.
Why, then, should we ever need the nonsense of an inferior measurement system that conspicuously offers less utility?  Rather than for Britain’s advancement, metrication is to help accomplish a dark political agenda  -  Britain’s subjugation, destruction of her English sophistication and culture and elimination of the English as a people.  To reduce everybody to one primitive level.
Lawful Britain
Select further reading Protecting the interests of British weights and measures  - http://www.bwmaonline.com/ Caution, metric signs are illegal. Keep it imperial - http://www.activeresistance.org.uk/ You should earnestly read this  http://www.freedom2measure.org/Our%20Units.html#right Truthful views about metric  - http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/estatopia/inch.htm#intro The benefits of English weights and measures  - http://home.clara.net/brianp/ametric.html Metrication is unnecessary, unwanted and undemocratic http://www.angelfire.com/ok4/iaml/


 
Share this topic...
In a forum
(BBCode)
In a site/blog
(HTML)


SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk