Ref President Trump and Europe.Letter to Ms May from Albert Burgess

  • 0 Replies

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Offline the leveller

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • 4128
  • +75/-0
Rt Hon Teresa May MP                                                               Albert Burgess
10 Downing Street
Ref President Trump and Europe
Dear Teresa
You job is to represent the best interests of the natural born subjects of her Majesty, President Trump is the legally elected leader of the United States, how he governs the United States of America is none of your business unless it impacts on her Majesty’s Kingdom. Take careful note it is her Majesty’s Kingdom not yours. You are only a Member of Parliament with a posh job. I am aware that Islam and the liberal snowflakes do not like President Trump but the majority of thinking natural born subjects of her Majesty actually support President Trump fully. So leave him alone it is not your job to undermine a LAWFULLY ELECTED HEAD OF STATE so mind your own business. You can also leave President Putin alone for the same reasons.
Which brings me to my second point, since when was Sharia law part of the law of her Majesty’s Kingdom, if you push Sharia law in this Kingdom you are committing treason contrary to the 1351 Treason Act it seems to me and I am not alone that the Britain First leadership are being prosecuted for resisting the imposition of Sharia in her Majesty’s Kingdom. I would remind you they are pursuing a legal duty to resist the imposition of Sharia in this Kingdom. There prosecution constitutes an unlawful act and high treason contrary to the above act which trumps any other acts on race relations or religious freedom. Any and every one resisting the imposition of Sharis in this her Majesty’s Kingdom is carrying out a legal obligation to defend the honour and dignity of Queen Elizabeth II.
Which brings me to my third point. The natural born subjects decided to reverse the treason of every government since Heath the arch traitor sold this ancient Kingdom out for the cost of a new boat, when we her Majesty’s loyal subjects voted to leave the EU that meant we leave, the boy David should have taken us out the day after the vote but her Majesty’s subjects hurt the poor boys feeling so he cut and ran and for some inexplicable reason you were elevated into his job at first you said all the right things, but your actions since give the lie to your words.
When her Majesty’s loyal subjects voted to leave the EU we voted for a number of things the primary reason being we love our Queen and the thought of her Majesty as a vassal Queen to the EU is not only an anathema to us it is also a constitutional impossibility if you knew anything at all about the Kingdom you live in you would know England’s Kings answer to God as Gods Lt’s and rule us according to Gods laws, and only to God and her subjects, and we voted to stop all monies to the EU to recover our fishing grounds, and to get away from the European court of human rights which we in this Kingdom never needed we all ready had Magna Carta 1215, a legally enforceable contract between the King and his subjects and the 1689 Bill of Rights which incorporates the 1689 Declaration of Right which is a legally binding contract between the King and his subjects.
When we voted to leave the EU a criminal enterprise we removed your authority to negotiate payments to Europe to keep any European influence over our fishing grounds, you have no authority to combine her Majesty’s armed forces with a European defence force. By giving our hard earned tax money to the EU you are committing the major crime of fraudulent misappropriation of tax payers money it is our money not yours. The police are already looking at that allegation of major crime. By allowing the ECJ any say in England you are committing a Praemunire and allowing the EU control of our fishing grounds is the crime of Provisos which equates to treason and before you tell me these to crimes were repealed, remember these crimes were brought in because King Edward III considered these crimes were an affront to his honour and dignity as King of England, ask your self this question is the honour and dignity of Queen Elizabeth II any less than the honour and dignity of King Edward III. Which of course it can’t be as they both hold the office of the Crown which in unchangeable,so what was treason for King Edward III is also treason for Queen Elizabeth II. The last woman hanged in this Kingdom was Ruth Ellis if you are not very careful you could be the next one to hang.
Respectfully submitted for your very careful consideration
Albert Burgess

Share this topic...
In a forum
In a site/blog

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk