show/hide profile info
Register to take part

Letter to David Cameron

  • 2 Replies
  • 1416 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Offline the leveller

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • 3513
  • +75/-0
Letter to David Cameron
« on: September 05, 2012, 04:46:44 PM »
The Prime Minister

The Hon. David Cameron Esq

 House of Commons
 Westminster
 LONDON.

 Dear Mr Cameron

 A couple of weeks ago I addressed correspondence to Mr Kenneth Clarke
 with copy to you.

 I was forthright in my comments and asked him if he would affirm or
 deny my allegation that he is a member of the Bilderberg Group and,
 apart from that, also on that Group's Steering Committee.

 I pointed out that whilst we have seen his attempts to bring us
 directly under Corpus Juris ( the last attempt being to introduce
 secret courts) this only goes to prove his alliance is to their agenda
 and not to our laws, constitution and any loyalty to England. I
 suggested he thus should not be in the position as our Governments
 Justice Minister.

 Naturally I can now suppose no answer will originate from Mr Clarke as
 you have today seen fit to remove him from that Office. However I did
 think you may yourself comment. This you have not done.

 I now write as the attached mail received by me today is , in my
 opinion extremely relevant. The position Mr Clarke is now to be in
 affords no end of scope and we do not wish to have the man in office
 at all. He cannot possibly have any loyalty to this country and must
 of necessity be beholden to his Builderberg masters. Of course it may
 also be argued that he will also be your master and that you yourself
 adhere to the Builderberg agenda - confirmed by your refusal to grant
 us our rights and to continue to refuse removal from the European
 Union which of course is nothing but a Builderberg vehicle towards
 New World Government.
>>
 It is suggested that all Prime Ministers since 1972 have had to be
 members of the Builderberg Group and maybe you will confirm your
 sition here either way.

 I have been direct in my suggestions and questions and now will again
 be so. May I please receive your answers to my letter and please, not
 the usual stereotype one seems always to receive. What I have put
 forward requires some direct answers from yourself Sir.

 Most sincerely
 Derek


*

Offline the leveller

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • 3513
  • +75/-0
Dear Prime Minister,
>
> Re: Exposing Ammanford - The Paedophile?s Playground
>
> I understand that correspondence sent to you is censored by a civil servant
> and that this person decides whether or not you should be given sight of it.
> I mention this in my opening paragraph because I would hate for you not to
> see this account of truth, when I intend to send it to quite a lot of other
> people that should be concerned about what I am about to reveal in this
> document.
> The list will include a large number of clergy, priests, Bishops, etc. Too
> often people in authority shout about matters like child abuse, paedophilia
> etc, but then do nothing constructive to bring the offenders to book.
> Unfortunately I believe you are falling into this category. You make
> statements and then nothing happens, e.g. you stated publicly that you had
> ordered the re-opening of the Madeleine McCann investigation and that no
> expense would be spared, well that is just as bad as the Sun Newspaper
> advertising that they are running a Madeleine McCann appeal and stating; any
> information you have no matter how insignificant it may seem, will be
> welcomed, what a load of hogwash.
> Why do I say it?s hogwash? Because, on Thursday 18th August 2011 I contacted
> Mike Sullivan,the Crime Editor of the Sun Newspaper, telling him I had
> information that the McCanns should be made aware of and also stated that I
> wanted to give them this information personally. Because I did not trust the
> police, he agreed to meet me, but never kept the appointment. I spoke to
> Mike on several occasions and he kept on agreeing to meet me regarding this
> matter but never did. Since the news of his arrest over illegal payments to
> the police were published, I wonder did his police friends put him off
> talking to me??
> Deciding I had to put my reservations about the police to one side, I phoned
> New Scotland Yard on Thursday 8th September 2011 at exactly 18-20pm and
> spoke to a woman called Nicky, telling her I needed to speak to someone
> regarding their investigation. At 20-55pm exactly Nicky phoned me back
> telling me that someone from the murder squad would contact me at 9am the
> next day Friday the 9th September 2011.
> Since then I have heard nothing. So how can it be that your good self and
> the Sun Newspaper make these statements to the British electorate? Is
> everything just sound bites and propaganda?
> Why didn?t I want to go to the police? Well from the experiences I have had
> trying to expose corruption and cover up within The Financial Services, The
> Courts and The Police, how can I trust anyone in authority, especially when
> I believe that Police, Doctors, Social Workers and a whole host of other
> professional bodies, are involved in child trafficking and paedophilia?
> And that last statement brings me to explain the reason I headed this
> correspondence Ammanford the Paedophiles Playground. Paedophilia is common
> place here and most of those being exposed are Policemen, Judges or Social
> Workers. I have made it my business to attend the family courts and see the
> illegal ways and practices the judiciary, solicitors, social services etc
> use to take children from their parents and put them up for adoption. The
> whole lot stinks and it is now becoming well known that these authorities
> have cottoned on to just how lucrative a market the trafficking of children
> is.
> I don?t believe it?s just the money. I believe it?s to satisfy the
> perversions of those people that lust after children. Just months ago a
> Satanic paedophile ring that had been operating for 30 years in Dyfed Powys
> was exposed and just yesterday an IT manager in a school nearby was caught
> in possession of 400,000 images of children. 750 of those images were cat 5,
> the worst category, and he had been getting away with it for decades!
> But what do you expect when numerous police officers have been caught doing
> exactly the same thing? Just two weeks ago an Inspector and three others
> were charged with paedophilia and procuring children to commit indecent
> acts. And when the Ex Chief Constable Mr Terrence Grange (now deceased) made
> statements to the media saying if a man has sex with a thirteen or fourteen
> year old girl, he should not be classed as a paedophile!!! How can a serving
> police officer make statements like that? Don?t you think that?s suspicious?
> Especially when he was heading some special child protection unit? If you
> don?t then do you think it?s suspicious when that same Chief Constable is
> later sacked for fiddling expenses and protecting a paedophile judge?
> The Ammanford Police seem more intent on covering up crime than they are
> exposing it, and I say that because I have had first hand experience of that
> cover up personally. If any crime reported in Ammanford concerns Doctors,
> the police, AMs, councillors or indeed any professional person, you may as
> well not bother reporting it, because it will only be whitewashed and
> ignored, leaving you frustrated and disillusioned with the justice system in
> the UK.
> I like most people I know, are completely and utterly fed up hearing the
> ridiculous sound bites that dribble out of the mouths of our so?called
> leaders like poison syrup. Your own backbenchers probably hit the nail on
> the head when the comment was made that you and your chancellor George
> Osborne are just a couple of posh boys with little understanding of the real
> hardships they are imposing on the great British working and the so called
> middle class inhabitants of this Island. The perfect example of a ridiculous
> and quite insulting sound bite came from you, and it was this: we are all in
> this together. What planet are you from; let me give you the perfect
> example; of the two tier system that separates the haves from the have nots.
> It has been widely reported that you and your wife left your young daughter
> in a public house because you forgot she was with you. The truth is I can
> relate to that, but if we are all in it together and the law is the law and
> the rules must be applied to all, why have you still got your children
> living with you? Have you had your hair sample taken for alcohol and drugs
> tests? Have you been attending parenting classes? If the answers to those
> questions are no, then withdraw that silly and insulting comment you have
> made. Because just over 2 miles from where I am now; a young Irish couple
> have had their children taken off them for doing the same thing as you,
> except, they didn?t leave their children in the pub. The mother left them in
> the living room of their house in front of the TV watching their favourite
> DVD and went to get her husband from the pub (not her children) because
> after suffering several miscarriages in the past, she panicked. When she
> started to bleed, she wanted her husband with her, which I can understand.
> So why haven?t you had the same scrutiny and imposed treatments as they have
> had to endure? The truth is we are so not in it together and the sooner
> people wake up to that fact, the sooner we can rid our society of this
> cancer of protected corruption among the people who run our lives. The
> policy of the last government and what this government seems to be carrying
> on is; the banks, big businesses and all powerful people are just too
> powerful to prosecute.
> Well the way to stop them holding a gun to your head threatening to leave
> the City of London, is to make them criminals and that stops or should stop
> them ever gaining employment in any position where they have access to
> peoples monies and pensions etc, find them guilty by examination instead of
> covering up their crimes because Britain will get a bad name, it?s as if you
> think the world isn?t watching.
> I am sitting here watching Bob Diamond the ex CEO of Barclays Bank squirm
> and grass the other banks up; he seems to be putting up as his defence
> argument this, that because the other banks were paying a lesser rate than
> Barclays then that disadvantaged Barclays and that Barclays was too big a
> concern to fail; so he was forced into committing a crime and it looks like
> the government overlooked this for the same reason. What a joke, don?t they
> know we are all in this together? So let?s asset strip him and all the
> previous offenders and that puts The London & Manchester Assurance Co now
> merged with Friends Provident aka LMAFP my nemesis, the most corrupt company
> you can imagine.
> I furnished every regulatory body that has ever been put in place with
> evidence to prove my allegations, and every one of them, Police included,
> has systematically covered up these crimes repetitively and in the same
> openly corrupt way. They have done this with thousands of other cases like
> mine and they (the whistleblowers) have and still are experiencing the same
> bully boy tactics that are imposed on all whistleblowers: first, ruin them
> financially, make them homeless and penniless, and if they continue on
> trying to blow the whistle, then claim they are delusional and nothing but a
> vexatious litigant and finally have them sectioned for life; unbelievable
> isn?t it?
> But it?s true and I can?t believe that you don?t know it?s true. Every day a
> new scandal is being exposed. It?s a pattern that fits exactly with what I
> and thousands of others like me have been trying to inform the Great British
> Public is happening, but since, as everyone knows, the newspapers are
> controlled by the Government of the day, hence the reason The Express, NOW
> and other Murdoch media would not print anything on the arms deals I
> reported instead of just letting them carry on unabated? It stinks, but too
> big to challenge, aye.
> It?s a sick joke but it?s not a bad dream: it?s a reality and if someone
> doesn?t pick up the gauntlet and make such an example of some of these super
> powerful criminals, then we are on a certain path to total and utter
> despair. BBC News on 5th July 2012 another 25 needless deaths are under
> investigation at St Mary?s Hospital Trust in Charing Cross.
> The only good thing I can quote is that some professionals are having a
> tussle with their conscience and blowing the whistle; but how long they will
> be prepared to carry on telling the truth is debateable, because his life
> will be ruined. The person I refer to, is Professor Patrick Pullicino. He
> states that Doctors are using LCP (Liverpool Care Pathway) as a pathway to
> euthanasia for old people for financial reasons and ?to ease bed blocking?.
> Once on this treatment they usually die within 33 hrs, and this kills off at
> least 130,000 patients a year needlessly! But it appears the massive saving
> made by the Treasury by not having to pay these poor victims the pension
> that they have worked for and paid into for all their working lives.
> If like me you start to try and expose crime in large powerful institutions,
> the first thing the system does, is class you as a vexatious complainant,
> and try to bully you into submission. If that fails and you get started in
> pushing your concerns into the courts, you become a vexatious litigant and
> they will have you sectioned into a mental institute for life. I can prove
> this is the case especially in Wales, where the only difference between a
> Psychiatrist and a Psychopath is the spelling.
> Being informed of the situation as it is here in Wales, any lack of action
> on your behalf makes you culpable.
> Could you please answer this correspondence and not just ignore it, like
> seems to be the normal way of doing things by Governments, when they have no
> answers or the remedy would just be too costly. Although I have stated I
> received no reply from the two prime ministers I gave this information to, I
> have their reply confirming receipt of my correspondence. I understand you
> and your Cabinet have some very difficult problems to solve; e.g. how to
> blame the unemployed for being responsible for starting the Third World War
> that we are slowly but surely being driven into, so I repeat to you
> something I said to Tony Blair in 2001: You are either apart from this evil
> or you are a part of it, Which one is it Mr Cameron???
> In finishing, I would ask you to scrutinise the attachments I have provided.
> They are reported incidents and not from my lips but they are giving
> credence to all I have stated.
>
> Yours sincerely
>
>
>
> Peter Bellett (long term whistleblower)
> http://www.peterbellett.wordpress.com/
>
> PS. Tony Blair and dozens of Labour MPs, the PIA, FSA Parliamentary
> Ombudsman, Financial Services Ombudsman and a whole host of others have had
> this information for years and aided in the cover up. They don?t seem to
> believe we are all in this together. And if I may suggest; talk to Peter
> Killfoyle or Tony Benn, because I have corresponded with them and others
> repeatedly over the past 12 years.
> Yesterday I witnessed the bitter and vitriolic exchange of words between
> George Osborne and Ed Balls, where Ed Balls told your Chancellor, ?to shut
> up or put up?. Well, if George Osborne wants to ?put up?, then I can give
> him evidence that Balls was in it up to his neck. Ed?s surname is very
> appropriate because that?s what you need to lie not only to the House of
> Commons but to lie in front of a Television audience.
> Ask him about Mr Magee Englefield and my meeting with him, before he was
> seconded from the corrupt PIA, where he was their chief investigator, into
> the FSA.
> What a joke, the man sat at my table and exclaimed when I showed him ?some?
> of the evidence of corruption I had, and I quote; we must ?stop? this from
> getting out because of the affect it will have on the investors.
> What a joke aye, but what a load of questions this gives George Osborne the
> chance of asking Ed Balls, or, is this a bit too much for the General Public
> to comprehend and therefore it?s best it?s all kept quiet?
>
>
> http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com


*

Offline the leveller

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • 3513
  • +75/-0
The latest open letter to David Cameron
« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2012, 11:27:28 AM »
 
 




An Open Letter to Prime Minister David Cameron
 

Gates of Vienna 5 September 2012
By Paul Weston
 In the wake of last Saturday?s fiasco in Walthamstow, Paul Weston, the Chairman of British Freedom, has written the following letter to Prime Minister David Cameron.
 Dear Prime Minister,
 I find it very disturbing that you, as a founding signatory of Unite Against Fascism (UAF),  are effectively endorsing totalitarianism and violence.
 As you may be aware, the UAF were involved in large scale violence last Saturday in Walthamstow. Their objective was to ensure that Freedom of Assembly and Freedom of Speech were denied to the English Defence League.
 In a previous open letter to you ? along with fellow Conservative MP Sir Peter Bottomley ? I asked if you were aware the UAF had appointed as their Vice-Chair a Mr Azad Ali, a known al-Qaeda sympathiser and anti-Semite. You clearly felt this to be a matter of such little importance it did not warrant a reply.
 No matter. I?m sure you have far more pressing matters of national importance to deal with than the trifling issue of Islamic supremacism, but could I ask that you watch the two videos embedded here? Having done so, perhaps you could answer the following questions:
 Do you think it is morally and politically acceptable for a British Prime Minister to publicly endorse the UAF, which as evidenced in the videos is both anti-democratic and violent?
 Whilst your views on the EDL are well known (you have called them "sick?) are you not horrified to see bricks, bottles and stones being thrown at a group of outnumbered people - including women - gathered together to exercise their democratic rights?
 You will notice the police are visibly shaken by the violence effectively carried out in your name. Were they under government orders to allow the situation to develop to the extent it became uncontrollable and therefore had to be closed down in the interests of public safety?
 You will also notice that not one of the people throwing potentially deadly projectiles was arrested. Why was this?
 Who gave the order that violent Muslims and Communists should be treated with kid-gloves?
 Were police commanders acting on their own initiative, or were they following government policy?
 Although the EDL refused to become involved in the violence initiated by the UAF, many were arrested on false grounds. Was this done in order that Freedom of Assembly becomes such a tortuous ordeal many people will simply give up?
 Do you consider the arrest policy to be within the law?
If not, do you really think the police can behave unlawfully simply because they assume the working class men and women arrested are unlikely to have access to expensive barristers?
 Again, I imagine this is being carried in accordance with government policy. I must seek your assurance therefore that this is not the case and that you fully support the EDL?s democratic right to Freedom of Assembly and Freedom of Speech?
 Are you really not aware that the UAF is a Communist organisation?
 Have you really accepted the left-wing propaganda which paints the EDL as a violent and racist movement?
Has it not occurred to you that despite being rough around the edges the EDL exists only to stand up to the ever growing demands radical Islam places on our liberal democracy?
 Can you please explain why violent left-wingers and radical Muslims can behave as they did on Saturday and remain free, whilst peaceful EDL members were arrested and not allowed to exercise their democratic rights?
 Does this not suggest something is very rotten in Cameron?s Britain?
 Is it not a sign of a genuine Police State that such a blatant disregard for democracy and law not only took place, but that the government and media subsequently remained silent?
 Is this really your vision of a democratic country, or are you just intent on enjoying your time in office, which means cracking down on the group which is easier to crush, no matter that the EDL stand for pro-democracy, pro-British, pro-conservative values whilst their opponents most emphatically do not?
 You must forgive my asking these questions, Prime Minister, but I value the democratic freedoms long associated with Great Britain ? which I am ashamed to say now seem threatened under your leadership. These freedoms were bequeathed to us via the blood and sacrifice of our immediate ancestors. They are not something you can just casually cast aside.
 What happened on Saturday in Walthamstow should never have happened in a country with a valid claim to democracy. It is essential, given the seriousness of the situation, that you find the time to answer the questions posed in this letter.
 On a final note, I do hope you will consider dropping your official endorsement of the UAF. Surely you must realise that a British Prime Minister should distance himself from such a violent, anti-Semitic, anti-British and anti-democratic movement which the UAF so obviously is?
 So, Prime Minister, what say you?               
Respectfully,
 Paul Weston
Chairman, British Freedom Party


 
Share this topic...
In a forum
(BBCode)
In a site/blog
(HTML)



COMODO SECURE

Powered by EzPortal
Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 
Comodo SSL