show/hide profile info
Register to take part

Labour Party Paedophile Scandal

  • 4 Replies
  • 3928 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Offline the leveller

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • 3560
  • +75/-0
Labour Party Paedophile Scandal
« on: March 28, 2013, 09:50:54 PM »
Labour Party Paedophile Scandal
 
Tue, 26/03/2013 - 06:00
 


By Cigpapers-Harriet Ruth Harman MP QC (born 1950) She was the interim Leader of the Labour Party, and Leader of the Opposition, from 11 May to 25 September 2010. Harman is currently Deputy Leader for the Labour Party.

After qualifying as a lawyer, Harriet Harman worked for Brent Law Centre in London. Her husband is Jack Dromey MP. She is the niece of Lord Longford.
 
Between 1978 and 1982, Harriet Harman was employed as the Legal Officer for the National Council for Civil Liberties which later became Liberty.
 
At the time the National Council for Civil Liberties was officially affiliated to two organisations, the Paedophile Information Exchange and the Paedophile Action for Liberation, whose members argued openly for the abolition of the age of consent.
 
When Harriet Harman first entered politics this matter was brought up, but a friendly media and other politicians accepted her claims that the NCCL no longer had any connection with P.I.E. /P.A.L. when she was Legal Officer between 1978 and 1982. However it later transpired that P.I.E./P.A.L. had been officially affiliated with the NCCL until 1982, when Harman left and P.I.E. /P.A.L. went underground.
 
She has since repeatedly veered between denying any connection with P.I.E. and P.A.L., and claiming that as a Legal Officer for the NCCL she had no choice in who she represented.

Patricia Hewitt ex MP was General Secretary of the National Council for Civil Liberties from 1974 to 1983.
 
As with a lot of liars Harman has different versions of events for different audiences.
 
Let?s look at the first lie that she was never connected or in contact with P.I.E. or P.A.L. in any way:
 
Documents now in the Public Domain show a NCCL letter signed by Harriet Harman objecting in the strongest terms to any laws against child pornography, unless it could be proved by the prosecution that the child was harmed.

The NCCL also submitted a response to the Government arguing for lowering the age of consent and stating ?Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage.?

When the Government moved to crack down on child pornography, the NCCL?s response, again signed by Harriet Harman, claimed the new law could lead to ?absurd prosecutions and increased censorship?.

As Legal Officer for the NCCL she also argued to abolish incest laws. Jack Dromey served on the NCCL Executive Committee from 1970 to 1979.

There are allegations that Lord Longford was part of this lobbying but no documentary evidence has emerged yet.
 
So having nailed the lie that she was never involved in P.I.E. or P.A.L. let?s have a look at the lie that she had no choice but to represent paedophile groups as Legal Officer for NCCL.

Well this is also obviously not true as visiting the NCCL/Liberty website will show that NCCL/Liberty state:
 ?Liberty receives thousands of requests for legal advice and assistance each year.
 
Because we're a small organisation with limited resources, our lawyers are unable to take up all of these cases actively.?
 
So clearly NCCL/Liberty don?t have to take up every case they are approached with.
 P.I.E. went underground in 1982, but resurfaced in June 2012 mounting a demo in support of Muslim paedophiles outside Liverpool Crown Court led by a Labour Party Councillor and Labour Party Activists.
 
For more Labour Party paedophile scandals Google ?Labour25?.


SOURCE --BNP WEBSITE
« Last Edit: March 28, 2013, 09:54:46 PM by the leveller »


*

Offline the leveller

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • 3560
  • +75/-0
What Jimmy Savile Really Did
« Reply #1 on: March 28, 2013, 10:14:46 PM »
What Jimmy Savile Really Did
1
March 27, 2013 by themadlands


If you are not following the revelations about Jimmy Savile closely and believe that he was a loaner who touched-up a few young groupies, then you have been deceived. Jimmy Savile?s actions go far beyond what you can even begin to believe: until you look at the evidence.
 
In this article I am going to tell you exactly how you have been deceived, why you have been deceived and why it matters to everyone in the UK.
 
All links in this piece open in new browser windows to allow you to read the further information in conjunction with this piece.
 
.
 
The Cover-up.
 
On 11th January 2013, the Metropolitan Police and the NSPCC published their joint report into the Operation Yewtree investigation, titled ?Giving Victims A Voice?.
 
The problems with that report were twofold. Firstly they did not actually give all the victims a voice, only the ones who reported lower-level abuse (and considering the abuse revealed included raping mentally and physically disabled people, the high-level abuse must be, as you will learn, far, far beyond even that). It will also become clear as to why some of the worst abuse will never have been reported to the Police.
 
The reason for this dumbing-down through an incomplete investigation, and reporting on it, is simple.  The authorities failed at all levels when it came to Savile.  By limiting the horrors we, the public, find out about, the less likely it is that there will be a public outcry against those who knew about, covered-up for and participated in the abuse at all levels of our society.
 
The second problem is that their main conclusion was false.  It was part of a cover-up.  The cover-up is in place to hide from the British public one very simple fact:
 
Child abusers linked to Jimmy Savile go right to the top of our society and acted with the full knowledge of our Government, security services, Police, Judiciary and Press.
 
?Evidence? I hear you scream!
 
DS David Gray, who helped to lead the Savile investigation stated there was no evidence to suggest that he was part of a paedophile ring.
 
We are meant to belive that a man who abused children over six decades never formed close links with those who shared his sickness?  We are meant to believe that a man who had the ear of Royalty, Prime Ministers and the Police was not well-connected enough to know of other paedophiles and act with them?  This predatory paedophile acted alone, or at worst as part of a ?loose network?.
 
That sounds to me like we are being deliberately led away from the truth?
 
Jimmy Savile?s nephew, Guy Marsden, told the press:
 

?Uncle Jimmy took me to his sick parties?.
 
In the article he goes on to say:
 

?A nephew of Sir Jimmy Savile yesterday told how his celebrity uncle attended ?paedophile parties?.
 
Guy Marsden was just 13 when ?Uncle Jimmy? took him to a wealthy celebrity?s house in London in 1967 for the first of many sordid social gatherings.
 
Over the next 18 months, Guy and his friends went to numerous ?parties? where he believes men sexually abused girls and boys as young as ten. Savile was at many of these events, he said.?
 
?Guy said Savile sometimes arrived with a man dressed as a priest and he believed the young victims may have come from an orphanage or children?s home.?
 
Does that sound like a man who is not part of a high-level paedophile ring?  How was he informed the parties were happening?
 
Surely by definition, a group of men arranging for care home children to be brought to private homes to be abused must be?.a paedophile ring?
 
Marsden goes even further, stating:
 


?The group of runaways ended up in a fabulous house ? believed to belong to a famous pop impresario ? with a big indoor swimming pool. The celebrity home was one of the party venues.
 
?At night you would get about 15 or 20 people turning up. There would be music and tables full of food, we couldn?t believe it. There was everything we needed and we just hung around.
 
?At first we automatically assumed the children lived there, but we soon realised they didn?t. They would be brought there, sometimes by Uncle Jimmy, and would stay for six or seven hours until 3 or 4am. They were just little kids, boys and girls.?
 
Guy Marsden, an eye-witness, close to Savile and with nothing to hide, states clearly not only that a paedophile ring was active, but that ?Uncle Jimmy? sometimes supplied the children.
 
If you had the head of operation Yewtree in front of you now, would you not ask:
 
?How on earth did you conclude there was no paedophile ring when there is clear witness testimony that states the complete opposite??
 
.
 
But That Was Just The Tip Of What Jimmy was involved in.
 
For decades there were rumours of a paedophile ring operating around the town of Scarborough, as this story from the Express shows.
 
Recently independent investigative reporters have started uncovering the truth of what happened there.  It is a story that involves a widespread knowledge amongst the local people, that was ignored due to the power of the people involved in it.
 
It is alleged to have involved a prominent local businessman, Peter Jaconelli, a friend of Jimmy Savile as the picture on the Express story linked to above shows.  There is also evidence it was a paedophile ring that involved local government officials and members of the North Yorkshire Police.  The NY Police had evidence and reports regarding the ring, Jaconelli and Savile for decades, but all investigations came to unexplained halts.
 
This article from the Real Whitby site, also gives evidence that Savile took children from a care home he had no jurisdiction over, for weekends away in, you guessed it, Scarborough.  Jimmy used his cult of personality to take children to the abusers:
 

?The Sunday People article confirms that Savile took patients from the safety of a secure controlled environment at Rampton to visit his close friends Peter Jaconelli and Jimmy Corrigan. The patients did not meet anyone else.
 
They were taken to Jaconelli at his Council offices in 1971.  During the 1972 visit they met him at one of his ice cream parlours (where Jaconelli is alleged to have routinely committed sexual offences) and from which the public had been specifically excluded, thereby ensuring that there were no witnesses to what happened.
 
The conclusion is therefore inescapable that Savile chose to take patients from Rampton to Scarborough in preference to taking patients from Broadmoor because:
 
Rampton is closer to Scarborough and where the other members of Jaconelli?s ring were located.
 
Scarborough was Savile?s preferred place to offend because Jaconelli?s status ensured they could operate safely without fear of arrest.
 
The sole reason behind both trips was to move vulnerable people to Scarborough to Jaconelli.
 
Given the allegations against Jaconelli and Savile, the concern must be that it is highly likely that the patients were abused on both visits, possibly even in the Mayor?s Council Offices.?
 
Savile was no lone wolf.  savile was a procurer of children for multiple high level paedophile rings, operating in Britain with the full knowledge of, and at times participation of, the people who we trust to run our country.
 
.
 
But Jimmy Was Not Just A Local Paedo Ring Procurer.
 
In 2008 the form childrens home of Haut De La Garenne on the island of Jersey was the centre of unbelievable child abuse allegations.  Those allegations were so widespread and so evil that many people simply did not believe them.
 
The worrying thing about Haut De La Garenne is that the initial findings were suddenly criticised.  The original Police chief taken off the case and the whole thing was dumbed-down and finally forgotten again. It was, in short, covered-up.
 
The problem is that 116 former child residents of the home, stand by what they say about the horrors that went on there. When we speak of horrors, let us be clear, we mean the rape, torture and murder of children by paedophiles.
 
Without going into details about the horror and cover-up of the Jersey paedophile scandal, I do want to address the Savile link to it.
 
In 2008 Jimmy Savile sued the Sun newspaper over pieces they had written in which the linked him to the abuse at Haut De La Garenne by claiming he visited it on many occasions.
 
The Sun produced photographic evidence of Savile at the home:
 


Savile?s response?  He slapped a super-injunction on the photo, forcing the Sun to not print it.
 
So Savile lied.  He had visited Haut De La Garenne.  Children from the home state he visited on MANY occasions. Even the head of the Police investigation, removed when the revelations about human remains came to light was reported as saying:
 

?The former head of the Jersey child abuse investigation has said he now suspects that Sir Jimmy Savile was implicated in the Haut de la Garenne children?s home abuse scandal.?
 
It was also revealed that:
 

?A solicitor who acted for victims of child abuse in Jersey also told the Guardian that some former Haut de la Garenne residents, both women and men, now claim they were assaulted by Savile in the 1970s.
 
Alan Collins, a solicitor for several Haut de la Garenne victims, said ?a handful? of former residents have now made abuse allegations about Savile. He said Savile?s name was mentioned several times during the police investigation of 2008 but that the evidence did not seem to stack up at the time.?
 
We are going to go down the rabbit hole a bit deeper now in relation to Jersey, so you can see the implications of what Jimmy Savile was part of.  As you have already seen he was evidently a procurer of children for paedophile rings.
 
This excerpt is from the now defunct News of the World:
 

?The youngsters were told by care staff the boat rides were treats?only to be assaulted and RAPED at sea by pervert toffs.
 
Details of the sick attacks emerged as we discovered even more blood has been found in a bath in the dungeon underneath the Haut de la Garenne home?and in the drains. And our reporters have been told how builders on renovations at the home were urged by staff to BURN any bones they dug up.
 
We also uncover the full extent of the dark forces of corruption hampering the police investigation. We can reveal worried cops feel under so much pressure over the abuse allegations they are preparing to BYPASS Jersey?s own legal system and hand their evidence to our government.
 
This could include files on up to seven social workers and carers who worked at the sinister home?including one nicknamed the ?pinball wizard? who HURLED kids against the walls to see how far they would BOUNCE. At least two previous senior employees of children?s services on the island are also under investigation despite the attempts of corrupt former policemen, politicians and businessmen to scupper the inquiry.
 
We understand that two weeks ago Jersey ministers SECRETLY VOTED to have senior police investigator Lenny Harper removed from the case because they believed he was too open with the media. But the Chief of Police Graham Power refused.
 
One of the most serious lines of inquiry in the investigation is that children were regularly loaned to wealthy yachtsmen to ?do with them what they chose for the day,? according to our source close to the investigation.
 
?Haut de la Garenne staff described the trips as a treat for children who spent long hours cooped up at the home. But in reality the kids were subjected to the vilest sexual abuse on board the luxury boats.
 
?Our source said: ?The allegations about the yachting community have come in from a number of different people??
 
I will go no further than to state that one of the people who regularly sailed around Jersey was The then Prime Minister Edward Heath.
 
Savile?s pal Edward Heath, who appeared on his BBC1 show Jim?ll Fix It, was Prime Minister at the time.
 
Bearing in mind what you have read so far and will read from this point on, can you begin to see the implications of what Jimmy Savile may have been involved in, and see reasons why the Government and security services would suppress the truth?
 
.
 
The Glass Elevator Smashes Through The Roof.
 
In the late 1980′s Prince Charles and Diana were having, as we all know, some pretty fundamental marriage problems.
 
Who did they turn to for assistance?  Jimmy Savile. It is incredible, but true.  The piece just linked to gives an overview of the story, but you have to look BEYOND what is written to see the reality.  This is not a story about Jimmy?s inappropriate behaviour at St James? Palace, you have to ask: why was he allowed to wander around?
 
?Savile is understood to have visited Prince Charles?s official London residence several times in the late 1980s when he was acting as a kind of marriage counsellor between Charles and Princess Diana. A spokesman for the Prince of Wales confirmed the prince and Savile formed a relationship in the late 1970s after coming together through their work with wheelchair sports charities. Charles led tributes to Savile when he died a year ago.?
 
So we have clear confirmation that Savile talked intimately to Charles and Diana.  We see that he was also a confirmed friend of Prince Charles for many years.  A man who we now know had allegations of paedophilia surrounding him for decades, was allowed to become close personal friends with the heir to the throne?  Where were MI5?  Are we to believe the security services, who already knew Savile?s lifelong friend Cyril Smith was a paedophile, were not aware?  That they had not done a security clearance check on him as would be standard procedure?
 
It is odd.  Negligent even. Perhaps the security services simply never informed Charles or Diana of their knowledge. Perhaps Charles just trusted someone who made themselves appear trustworthy.
 
Lets join some more dots for you right now.
 
.
 
Elm Guest House, Islington & Richmond.
 
In late 2012 MP Tom Watson shocked the house to silence when he rose and stated that he had seen clear evidence of a high level paedophile ring operating high in London society, going even to the doors of number 10 itself.
 

This statement was linked to the dossier on Peter Righton, a disgraced civil servant who networked with other paedophiles as part of the Paedophile Information Exchange. beneath a veneer of civility PIE members carried out sickening abuse.
 

Righton?s diary is reputed to contain entries were he described his abuse and then marked the boys out of ten for the punishments they could take.  In short, these men were absolute monsters.
 

In 1992 the Evening Standard tried to uncover the paedophile ring involving many of the PIE members and others, operating in London and supplied with boys from the care homes of Islington. Despite it and others having tried to uncover the truth many times, little action was taken and many suggested powerful paedophiles escaped justice.  It was dismissed as fantasy and conspiracy theory and buried.
 


The Islington scandal is linked to that of Elm Guest House. Elm was a gay brothel that also catered for peadophiles.  It advertised in coded messages to those paedphiles as a location where there was even a room with film equipment in it.
 

Operation Fernbridge is currently investigating the Elm guest house scandal, which was forced upon it after care workers from the time leaked evidence onto the internet stating that high level people visited it to abuse children. Those children were supplied from the care homes of Islington. Despite the clear evidence of high level abusers, only two people have been arrested so far.
 

I do urge you to read as much of this a you can at some stage to see just how extensive and far-reaching the Elm guest house scandal is, and why it is being covered-up. You will also read why it was covered up at the time: because a cabinet minister was implicated in visiting it.
 

Just in case you are in any doubt that there is a cover-up going on, this excerpt from the Star shows there was:
 



?But a former detective who worked on the case revealed they were ?suddenly told to halt the probe.
 
The furious ex-policeman said: ?It wasn?t that we ran out of leads but it reached a point where a warning to stop came.
 
?It was a case of ?get rid of everything, never say a word to anyone?. It was made very clear to me that to ?continue asking questions would ?jeopardise my career.?
 
?Evil and probably part of an obvious cover-up.  But, how does this link to Uncle Jimmy?? I hear you say. OK, lets move on.
 
.
 
To The Palace.
 
For ten short days in 1982 the press openly and frequently reported on the Elm guest house scandal as it unfolded.  Then, suddenly, despite all the evidence mounting of a paedophile ring involving the government and being covered-up by the government, they stopped.
 
Why?
 
Perhaps because of hints in some of the stories printed at the time and later.
 
?The customers included three MP?s and a member of the staff at Buckingham palace.?
 
Palace link in child sex scandal.
 
The link had been established between the scandal of care home children from Islington and Richmond being supplied to paedophile brothels, to paedophiles within the Palace.
 
Now I know you are thinking ?I see where you are going, but this is circumstantial evidence.  Just because there were paedophiles operating at the Palace, it does not mean Jimmy Savile knew that?.
 
Let?s just fill you in on a few more details.
 
Savile was not only ?brought in? to help Charles and Diana.  He was also called upon to aid Sarah Ferguson.


?I was helping her not get publicity rather than get it ? to cool things down?.?
 
Does Jimmy Savile seem a likely person to you to call upon to help you lower your profile? No, me neither.  So you have to question the reason for his calling upon.
 
You probably also don?t know just how cosy he was with the Queen:
 

?As for Savile?s relationship with the Queen, he suggested it was somewhat lighthearted. ?She thinks I?m odd because odd things always seem to happen when I?m at BP,? he said last year, referring to Buckingham Palace. ?One time I was at a party there and the Queen said: ?I do not recognise this person, I bear no responsibility if anything should happen? ? the Queen likes a joke. The next minute I bump into a lady who turns out to be Barbara Bush.
 
?When she sees me she says: ?Jimmmyyyy!? and flings her arms out and knocks champagne all over the woman next to her who says ?S***!? in a very loud voice and steps back in her high heel on to the foot of the woman behind. The Queen shook her head, took me by the arm, stood me against the wall and said: ?Stay there and don?t move!? So I did. After all she is the Queen.?
 
Diana mentioned Savile in the ?squidgygate? tape:
 
?She was recorded saying: ?Jimmy Savile rang me up yesterday, and he said: ?I?m just ringing up, my girl, to tell you that His Nibs [Charles] has asked me to come and help out the redhead [Ferguson]?.?
 

Along with his friendship with Prince Philip, until a reported falling out that nobody has ever heard a reason for, we have compelling evidence that Savile was welcome at the Palace.  Able to basically wander into a Palace and speak with Royalty.  A Palace whose staff contained an alleged paedophile ring linked to Elm Guest House.
 


On 16th February 2013 Exaro News reported that:
 


?Exaro has established that Haroon Kasir, known as Harry, who was co-manager of the guest house, used to boast that he was ?best friends? with Savile. Kasir would tell friends how Savile used to visit him frequently.?
 

It was also said:
 


?Harry started to behave strangely after Jimmy died?.
 


Jimmy Savile. Elm Guest House. The Palace.  Now do you see why what Jimmy really got up to has been brushed under the carpet?
 


.
 
One Final Drop Down The Rabbit Hole.
 

Some celebrities, such as Esther Rantzen, have been less than honest about what they really knew of Jimmy Savile.  Esther for example, the ?lovely lady? of childline, claimed she only heard one vague rumour back in the 1970′s and dismissed she knew any more in a gushing interview with Piers Morgan.
 

The problem is that she was told many times, as this article shows:
 

?ESTHER Rantzen faces claims that she failed to act on Jimmy Savile paedophile rumours.Abuse campaigner Shy Keenan says she alerted her 18 years ago.Shy ? who represents the charity The Phoenix Post, a victims? advocacy group ? said she raised concerns she had heard about the depraved star when she was contributing to a TV show.?
 

Others, are being far more honest.
 

My final piece of the puzzle comes from Mr Andy Kershaw.  In his article he says:
 

?When the news broke of Jimmy Savile?s death, I sat before the rolling television news channels in a state of exasperation and disbelief. Celebrities, media heavyweights, and even representatives of the great and the good, were scrambling to gush eulogies to a man they were eager to canonise as Saint Jimmy of Stoke Mandeville or, at least, a much-loved national treasure.Every one of these mourners knew better than to pay tribute. For every one of them, as creatures of the media or the entertainment industries, had, for years, heard the persistent rumours about the real Jimmy Savile. Even in death ? and for another 12 months ? Savile would continue to pull off a public relations swindle of spectacular audacity.?
 

He goes on to say:
 

?Typical of those with 20/20 hindsight was Esther Rantzen. Within a couple of days of the Savile scandal breaking, Esther Rantzen, founder of Childline, and someone not previously shy of hobnobbing with Savile, was asking us to believe she had heard the rumours but had dismissed them as ?green room gossip?. Later, and presuming to speak on behalf of the nation, Rantzen popped up on BBC News to wring her hands and claim: ?We are all guilty now.?
 
Not me, Esther, old thing. At Radio 1, as soon as I heard the Savile rumours, I gave the guy a very wide berth. And in my autobiography, No Off Switch, written and first published while Savile was still alive, I hinted as strongly as I could that there may be a darker side, describing him as a ?veteran Radio 1 DJ, tireless charity worker, another national institution, widely recognised for his interest in young people?.
 
Note the words I have highlighted.  Kershaw states he hinted at the true scale of what Savile did. Now look at the title of his article:
 
?The Jimmy Savile scandal will not be snuffed out?.
 
Snuff is of course a term for movies which involve the murder of people in a violent sexual context.  Most of these unbelievably evil films involve paedophiles and children.  In the age before the internet they were passed around in video cassette for significant sums of money. It was an industry, men got rich out of the absolute evil depicted.
 
?Category 5″ child porn.  The type that Police officers have to watch and state, understandably, that it ruins their lives having to do so.
 
Elm Guest House had video equipment.  Men linked to the Elm scandal also had links to child trafficking and porn in the Netherlands.
 
Jimmy Savile.  Elm Guest House.  The Palace. The Government.  Child Trafficking.  Snuff movies.
 
A few people have now come forward to say that they witnessed ?Satanic? rituals involving Jimmy Savile in the basement of Stoke Mandeville hospital and in Scarborough.
 
Another person has stated that Cyril Smith, who as we know was a lifelong friend of Savile, was friends with a noted Satanist and visited his house.
 
Others are also now beginning to break their traumatised silence on having seen children killed in satanic paedophilie rituals involving notable people including Jimmy Savile.
 
Jimmy Savile.  Elm Guest House.  The Palace. The Government.  Child Trafficking.  Snuff movies.  Satanism.
 
Now can you begin to see why, even if only half of the above is true, why the establishment have covered-up the truth about what Jimmy Savile did?
 
Discount the Satansim as fantasy.  You still have links to Royalty, Politicians, paedophile rings containing murderers and cabinet ministers, child trafficking and snuff movies.
 
Don?t want to believe the royalty stuff?  Take that out as well.  You still have The Government, child trafficking, snuff movies and a paedophile ring containing politicians and a child murderer.
 
Can?t contemplate the snuff movies stuff, take that out as well.  In fact, take it all out, everything you have just read.
 
Do you still, after reading it, really believe Savile was a lone wolf who touched up a few women and had sex with willing groupies, and that there has been no cover-up?
 
Of course you don?t.  You have a brain. But just in case you are still doubtful.  Edwina Currie was asked on Twitter if there has been a cover-up about Elm Guest House:
 




If there was a cover-up there, then there was a cover-up over Savile.  Victims have not come forward to report some of the worst abuse, because a you have seen, he may have been in a paedophile ring with Cyril Smith that contained a prolific child murderer. You cannot report a crime if you are dead or have been trafficked abroad.
 
.
 
Why This Matters To You.
 
Some have dismissed this scandal, even if you believe all I have told you, as all in the past.  Old news. people now old or dead.  irrelevant.  A previous generation, different rules.
 
It Could not happen again.
 
Deep down you already know it could happen again.  If they got away with it last time, there are probably protected people doing the same thing to innocent stolen children right now.  Safe in the knowledge they can do what they want because the establishment is covering up for them.
 
I know you are thinking ?why would they cover this evil up??
 
One of the named people who was allegedly photographed at Elm guest house having sex with children was a top politician.  He has links to both David Cameron and Nick Clegg and their families.  If he is arrested, people will ask how on earth none of those people knew.
 
How did the security services, who vetted BBC employees throughout the 1960′s and 1970′s, not know about Savile, or Elm guest house and inform anyone? How was Savile allowed anywhere near the Royal family?
 
How did the currently serving politicians, who were at the time senior councillors and legal people linked to Islington and Richmond councils never hear about what was evidently a widespread scandal of child trafficking in their boroughs?
 
How did nobody in the BBC ever hear anything so dark and horrifying?  Even with the current stories of yet more BBC paedophile rings involving staff on both Doctor Who and Eastenders showing that their ?saw no evil, heard no evil? stance simply isn?t credible?
 
How did so many ex-Police and care workers never get listened to when they spoke out about both the scale of the abuse and the fact they were warned off, time after time after time?
 
The truth, whatever the exact details of what Jimmy did, or what the Politicians and others did, is:
 
THEY ALL KNEW.
 
THEY ALL KNOW.
 
THEY ARE ALL COVERING IT UP TO PROTECT THEIR OWN SKINS.
 
What happened in this country is a national scandal.  If the truth is allowed to come out, through the Police involved in operations Yewtree, Fernbridge and Fairbank having their shackles taken off and the evidence stolen from them by MI5 in the 1980′s, including photo?s, are returned to them, then it would make the Profumo scandal look like a tea party.
 
If you have a shred of compassion for children and a sense of right and wrong, what you have read should have left you shaking with anger.
 
Innocent children, taken from care homes, disowned and then destroyed by powerful, evil men and all covered-up by other powerful people who want to avoid a scandal.
 
And that is just the ?highlight? scandal. There is also what happened in Wales.  It has happened across our country time and time and time again. Time and time and time again, it has been covered-up.
 

Why?
 

To stop you from getting angry and demanding it stop and people in power being held to account.
 

.
 


IF the past is ignored, it sends a message to those who would act in the same way today that we will accept it.
 
.
 

Tweet your MP. 


Write to your MP and demand the home secretary commissions an enquiry.
 
.
 
.
 
If you now walk away from this piece without acting, you are tolerating the abuse.
 
.


*

Offline the leveller

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • 3560
  • +75/-0

[email protected]~-

Buy Blacks Law Dictionary - Amazon
[email protected]~-

*

Offline the leveller

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • 3560
  • +75/-0
Re: Labour Party Paedophile Scandal
« Reply #3 on: March 28, 2013, 10:27:57 PM »
Folk,

 This sort of behaviour by our police, who are now nothing more than political puppets of the criminal government in Westminster, is the reason why we will never get to the bottom of such scandals as the Jimmy Savile affair, the Haut de la Garenne children's home in Jersey (where the lead police investigator was also sacked for doing his job) and the Dunblaine school massacre, the report on which was blocked for 100 years by Tony Blair when it became clear that leading politicians were involved in child abuse. Paedophilia and the abuse and disappearance of children in the care system are out of control in the UK. How much longer are we going to allow this to go on?

 Mike.

 


Paedo MP cover-up claim: Top cop removed from sex abuse probe after naming politicians as suspects  26 Mar 2013 00:00
The officer suddenly found himself booted off the case and put on a disciplinary after revealing ?politicians were among the suspects.
 
 
 
Axed: DCI Clive Driscoll
 
Tasked with flushing out ?paedophiles preying on vulnerable youngsters at children?s homes, Detective Chief Inspector Clive Driscoll relished the challenge.
 
But the officer suddenly found himself booted off the case and put on a ?disciplinary after revealing ?politicians were named among the suspects.
 
At least one of the figures is understood to have been an MP.
 
And former Labour councillor Anna Tapsell claims she was visited by a police chief to ?warn her off? after she raised concerns that detectives would not ?properly investigate allegations of ?paedophile activity in care homes.
 
Mr Driscoll launched his probe into child sex abuse claims in the South London borough of Lambeth in 1998.
 
But he claims Scotland Yard began meddling as soon as the politicians were named.
 
The officer, now spearheading the fresh investigation into teenager Stephen Lawrence?s murder, said: ?I was unhappy with the interference of some senior officers who did not appear to have a logical connection to my investigation into child sex abuse in Lambeth.
 
?There were allegations made by several people that named politicians had been involved but I never had a chance to investigate them because I was moved before I could do so.?
 
Council campaigner: Anna Tapsell was warned off by police
John Nguyen
 

Asked if there was a cover-up of child sexual abuse in Lambeth by Scotland Yard, he said: ?You would need an ?investigation to establish that.?
 
And asked if it was true that a file of evidence naming politicians as suspects and others was lost, he replied: ?I handed the file to an officer and I have no ?knowledge where it went after that.?
 
Mr Driscoll was yesterday supported by Ms Tapsell, a chairwoman of Lambeth?s social services committee who has ?highlighted sexual abuse of children in the borough?s care for more than two decades.
 
She said: ?When I learned that Clive was being removed, not only from the case but also from Lambeth, I realised that the Met were caving in to political pressure that was far more powerful than Lambeth Council.
 
?I was aware of allegations about an MP and the Met?s failure to act on those allegations and its apparent desire to silence those who called for them to be investigated fully was deeply shocking to me.
 
"Council employees who tried to expose staff they suspected of sexual abuse were sidelined and ignored.
 
?At the same time alleged perpetrators were moved or allowed to leave for financial misconduct or other ?misdemeanours, instead of for the abuse.
 
"This meant many children never received the justice they deserved.?
 
Former kids' home: Now a private residence

After Mr Driscoll?s removal, Ms Tapsell told how she raised fears about the depth of the investigation into sex abuse claims at Brixton?s Angell Road children?s home and South Vale youth assessment centre in West Norwood during a meeting of the Community Police Consultative Group.
 
She alleges a high-ranking officer later arrived at her home.
 
Ms Tapsell added: ?I doubt whether I was the only person to be visited by a senior police officer in an attempt to warn me off.
 
"I had cast doubt on the Met?s ?inclination to get to the bottom of the paedophile activity within Lambeth?s care system.
 
?It had outraged a high ranking officer who had spoken at that meeting. That resulted in an unpleasant visit to my home by another senior officer.
 
?I have found the minutes of that meeting in the archives of Lambeth?s CPCG but no mention is made of the high-ranking officer?s contribution and the tape recording is also missing.?
 
Labour MP John Mann, a former Lambeth councillor, said last night: ?It is essential that an outside force conducts a full investigation into these claims.?
 
Mr Driscoll, who has had a ?distinguished career in the Met for three decades, told how disciplinary proceedings ? known as a regulation 15 notice or a 163 form ? were started against him after he named the ?politicians in a ?confidential meeting with council ?officials in the late 90s.
 
Probe: Labour MP John Mann wants an inquiry

He said the action followed a complaint by an executive on the council. The officer was also moved from Lambeth.
 
The detective was investigated and questioned under caution by other officers.
 
Mr Driscoll added: ?I was handed a 163 form. It was revoked after they moved me and all disciplinary action was dropped.?
 
The Met set up a five year investigation into sexual abuse linked to Lambeth social care called Operation Middleton.
 
It was a joint probe with the council and was based in the town hall, leading to criticism that the Met were working too closely with the organisation that had employed abusers.
 
Officers traced 200 victims between 1998 to 2003 and the probe secured three convictions.
 
A total of 19 suspects were never identified, fuelling fears a ?paedophile ring had operated involving men from outside the care system.
 
Michael John Carroll, the former boss of the Angell Road home, was arrested in 1998 by Merseyside police for abuse spanning decades.
 
By that time Ms Tapsell had spent more than 10 years highlighting his case after she discovered Lambeth bosses let him run children?s homes until 1991 despite ?executives learning in 1986 he was a convicted ?paedophile.
 
In 1994, she wrote to Elizabeth Appleby QC, who had been ?commissioned to head a probe into sex abuse and misconduct in the borough.
 
Convicted paedophile: Michael Carroll ran kids' home
Daily Mirror
 

Ms Tapsell told the judge that Carroll, who had not at that point been arrested, was ?protected? by Lambeth social ?services bosses along with paedophile Les Paul who worked in South Vale.
 
Paul was jailed for two and a half years in 1994 for abusing three boys including one from the children?s home.
 
Ms Tapsell wrote: ?Les Paul took little boys home and on holiday, just as Carroll did with the full knowledge of area staff. The examples are numerous.
 
?Almost all the internal abuse issues have involved collusion across divisions.
 
"I have no doubt Angell Road may have been used for organised child abuse which involved adults other than staff.
 
"This view is reinforced by the strong investment that officers and politicians have in blocking any effective investigation.?
 
Ms Appleby declined to comment.
 
Clare Whelan, a Lambeth Tory councillor since 1990, claims she was repeatedly ignored by police when she tried to highlight the Carroll case.
 
She added: ?I was never confident that it was all properly investigated.
 
?It took far too long for police to investigate and I had to see three sets of officers before they did anything. Even then they did not do anything really.?
 
A Scotland Yard spokesman said: ?We are unable to comment on detailed allegations at this time without the opportunity to research these allegations.
 
"However, if any new evidence should come to light it will be investigated.?
 
* If you are an adult who suffered child abuse and want professional help call the NSPCC on 0808 800 5000, email [email protected] text 88858.
 
Distinguished detective who snared Stephen Lawrence killers
Clive Driscoll has enjoyed a distinguished 34-year career as a police officer.
 
The widely-respected detective helped restore the Metropolitan Police?s damaged name with his successful probe into two of Stephen Lawrence?s killers.
 
Dad Neville Lawrence backed the officer in 2012 after Gary Dobson and David Norris were convicted of Stephen?s 1993 murder.
 
Mr Lawrence said: ?He seemed committed and confident. That?s all I need to know, that you believe in what you?re doing.?
 
Mr Driscoll started his career as a PC at Sutton in South London before being promoted to detective sergeant in Brixton in 1987.
 
He was later transferred to Scotland Yard and put in charge of policy for sexual offences, domestic violence, child protection and the paedophile unit.
 
He returned to South London to work in child protection before being promoted to detective chief inspector on the racial and violent crime taskforce in Fulham in 2003.
 
He was then appointed senior investigating officer in Operation Fishpool, the re-investigation into Stephen?s murder.
 
After a jury finally convicted Gary Dobson and David Norris, Mr Driscoll said: ?It has been a joy and a privilege to work with the Lawrences.
 
"They are happy. I always said I wanted to get it to a jury. We?ve done our very best.?
« Last Edit: March 28, 2013, 10:38:57 PM by the leveller »


*

Offline the leveller

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • 3560
  • +75/-0
Re: Labour Party Paedophile Scandal
« Reply #4 on: March 28, 2013, 11:33:19 PM »
Much info posted here
http://truth-wars.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=678.msg1022#msg1022
Please read and spread the links


 
Share this topic...
In a forum
(BBCode)
In a site/blog
(HTML)



COMODO SECURE

Powered by EzPortal
Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 
Comodo SSL