Rollout of 5G and the risk of harm .

  • 0 Replies
  • 395 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Offline sr john

  • Sr John .
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 915
  • +8/-0
    • exposetheothers.com
Rollout of 5G and the risk of harm .
« on: August 06, 2019, 08:09:41 PM »
Published 28 July 2019 .

There is a lot of science demonstrating plausible risk of harm from electromagnetic fields, says Damien Downing, and campaigners against 5G are simply alerting people to the evidence, says Sally Beare .

Has the Guardian never heard of the precautionary principle (How baseless fears over 5 G rollout  created a health scare, 26 July)? The one the Stewart report (from the Independent Expert Group on Mobile Phones) called for in 2000, but which has been ignored ever since? The one that says government has a responsibility to protect the public from exposure to harm, when scientific investigation has found a plausible risk?

Whatever labels a baseless  half science  cherry picked   you put on it, there is quite a lot of science demonstrating plausible risk of harm from electromagnetic fields, far too much to dismiss with a chuckle from the hardly impartial head of technology communications for EE, Howard Jones .

In contrast, Martin Pall has published extensively on this subject, including demonstrating the principal mechanisms of harm, and that this happens the same way in animals and plants as in humans .

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/jul/28/rollout-of-5g-and-the-risk-of-harm .

« Last Edit: February 23, 2020, 05:28:47 PM by sr john »
Spreading The Truth .
Thanks  Sr John .

 
Share this topic...
In a forum
(BBCode)
In a site/blog
(HTML)


SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk