Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
Politics - Things you should know / "and pick up your trash"
« Last post by the leveller on August 06, 2020, 06:15:22 PM »

Colorado City Runs Antifa & BLM Out of Town - All Of America Needs To See This - News Punch
[ July 29, 2020 ] Colorado City Runs Antifa & BLM Out of Town – All Of America Needs To See This News [ July 29, 2020 ] Judge Allows Pedophile Politician To Walk Free After He’s Caught With 1 Million Child Abuse Images News [ July 29, 2020 ] Adult Star Jenna Jameson: Hollywood Is Run By Pedophiles Who ‘Sacrifice and Torture Children’ News
Politics - Things you should know / letter from Border Force Team
« Last post by the leveller on August 05, 2020, 06:47:32 PM »
Border Force Correspondence Team
Priory Court
St John’s Road
Kent CT17 9SH
Ms P Woods

Date 4 August 2020
Our Ref TO 256552
Dear Ms Woods
Thank you for your email dated 31 July addressed to the Prime Minister and the
Home Secretary regarding small boats attempting to cross the Channel carrying migrants
to the UK. This has been passed to the Border Force Correspondence Team and I have
been asked to reply.
No-one should be making these dangerous and illegally-facilitated crossings from France.
France is a safe country with a well-run asylum system. No-one should be getting on
these boats and putting themselves in danger. The safest thing anyone can do is seek
protection in the first safe country they reach.
The Government is determined to put a stop to these crossings, and all attempts to reach
the UK clandestinely. The Home Secretary and the Home Office is working in
collaboration with the French Government and the relevant international law enforcement
agencies to tackle this dangerous and illegal activity. It is bearing down on the facilitators
and organised crime groups behind this illegal activity and taking all possible measures to
return those who arrive here back to France.
Despite robust action to tackle illegal migration both domestically and internationally,
smugglers will always seek to find ways to get people to the UK. We are using all the
skills of Border Force, the National Crime Agency, Immigration Enforcement and French
law enforcement to dismantle and arrest the criminal gangs who trade in people
smuggling. The Home Secretary is also developing plans to reform policies and laws that
will change the UK’s overall approach to illegal migration and the associated criminality
that takes place to stop these crossings completely. In some areas, this will require
changes to legislation.
The Government is doing everything it can to bring these malicious criminals to justice and
curb this illegal trade. It is not a simple task and requires action from both sides of the
Channel. Governments across Europe are in the same position and we are working fast to
implement a solution.
Assets on the ground in France have been enhanced and now provide 24/7 cover of the
northern beaches. The Government is continuing efforts to crack down on the criminal
gangs who facilitate the crossings. The National Crime Agency and the Home Office have
introduced a permanent presence in France, with operational leads now based in Paris
and Calais. This is to aid intelligence sharing between the two countries and to target the
criminal networks involved.
In addition to this, the UK-France Coordination and Information Centre opened in Calais in
November 2018 as part of the ongoing co-operation between the UK and France to tackle
criminality at the border. The centre sees Border Force working closely alongside Police
Aux Frontieres as part of a 24/7 operation to:
• Assist with preventing illegal attempts to cross the shared border;
• Exchange real-time intelligence between UK and French agencies to combat crossborder criminality;
• Work on the prevention of threats to public order on cross-border infrastructure; and
• Provide joint analysis of cross-Channel traffic flows.
Officers from Immigration Enforcement and the National Crime Agency are also based in
the Co-ordination and Information Centre.
Our law enforcement response is delivering results. In the first quarter of this year, over
1,100 migrants were arrested in France compared to 342 arrests in the same period last
year. Last year, Immigration Enforcement made 418 arrests, leading to 203 convictions
for a total of 437 years. Out of these, 259 arrests and 101 convictions were for people
smuggling. Immigration Enforcement carried out 841 disruptions against organised crime
gangs and individuals engaged in organised immigration crime, 404 of which were related
to people smuggling. This year, over 10 people smugglers have been convicted and put
behind bars as a result of Immigration Enforcement investigations, with more
investigations underway.
In addition, the Home Secretary is regularly in touch with her French counterpart to
address the many issues associated with these crossings, including operational measures
to prevent crossings as well as practices and legal measures to return more migrants to
We should be in no doubt about the threat to life posed by these crossings, and we are
very focused on saving lives. The small unseaworthy dinghies are crossing one of the
busiest shipping lanes in the world often in front of large container ships. The people
onboard the dinghies are wearing unsuitable life jackets on rough waters and are unaware
of the real and imminent danger they are in. Under our legal duties and maritime laws,
once they are in UK waters the Border Force teams need them to comply and listen
quickly so that they can be brought to safety. This is not straight forward and often fraught
with difficulties and resistance.
There is also considerable policy work going on to understand where individuals may
exploit opportunities to make vexatious claims for protection. The Government wants to
reduce unmeritorious claims in order to ensure the UK offers protection to those in fear of
persecution or from other high risks.
I can reassure you that Coronavirus (COVID-19) has not had an impact on the Home
Office’s capability to respond to illegal migration and Border Force and Immigration
Enforcement will always be given the resources needed to tackle these thoughtless and
dangerous crossings. All teams are fully operational, with Border Force having a total fleet
of five cutters and six coastal patrol vessels. Border Force’s deployment of maritime
capabilities is under constant review.
These attempted crossings are reckless acts facilitated by criminals. People smuggling is
illegal making these small boat crossings illegal. We are determined to stop these illegal
crossings but as with all organised criminal activity, this will take time. The Government is
absolute in its determination to use all means to end it.
I hope my reply has been of help and clarified the situation for you.
Yours sincerely
By email
Ms A Button
Correspondence Office
31 July 2020  .

Scientists at Northwestern University say they are making a chip that would connect your brain to the internet .  .
n 02/08/2020 01:29
Video: Antifa Terrorists Burn Bibles, Flags in Portland, Scream ‘F**k Trump’

It seems that pigs heads aren’t the only thing being set ablaze in Portland, Oregon.  On Saturday, video emerged of Antifa/BLM terrorists burning a stack of Bibles in front of the federal courthouse there. “Public gatherings to burn Bibles: OK Public gatherings to read Bibles: BANNED,” one Twitter user declared, sharing a video posted by Ian Miles Cheong. >Here is the video: Public gatherings to burn Bibles: OK Public gatherings to read Bibles: BANNED — Razor (@hale_razor) August 1, 2020

The New York Post reported: The post featured a video which showed protestors with “Black Lives Matter” signs tossing bibles into a raging bonfire. The video, which has gone viral, had more than 1.8 million views and thousands of retweets. “Now we move to the book burning phase,” said Donald Trump Jr. in a tweet Saturday. “I’m pretty sure ANTIFA doesn’t actually stand for what they say it stands for. Maybe just remove the anti part of [their] name and it’s perfect,” he wrote. The fire was later put out by members of Moms United for Black Lives Matter, who doused the flames with bottles of water and stomped on the embers, according to KOIN 6, a local CBS affiliate television station in Portland.

In another tweet, Cheong noted: “I don’t know what burning the Bible has to do with protesting against police brutality. Do not be under the illusion that these protests and riots are anything but an attempt to dismantle all of Western Civilization and upend centuries of tradition and freedom of religion.”

Perhaps, since Portland Mayor Tom Wheeler loves these terrorists so much and doesn’t give a damn if the city is destroyed, President Trump should build a wall around the city, give patriots living there a window in which to leave, and let the radicals burn the rest to the ground.

James Sanchez
24  June 2020  .

While the debate is heating up across the world about artificially intelligent lifeforms like robots gaining an intelligent consciousness. There are also various newly evolved technological plans to implant Artificial Intelligent chips into human minds. Yes, that's right. There are in fact various projects, being developed at a rapid pace across the world, that aim to integrate computer programmed implant chips into the brains of humans, that can have an immense mind-altering potential. In 2014, BBC reported of a project funded by Bill Gates of birth control chips being implanted into a woman's skin, the chip would have an ON and Off switch . .
The UK - General Discussion / Letter to Justin Welby from Albert Burgess
« Last post by the leveller on July 29, 2020, 06:37:54 PM »

we see a lot about Magna Carta 1215 as being new law but it was not new law it was simply a reissue of existing law Freedom of information request

Justin Welby Archbishop of Canterbury Albert Burgess
Lambeth Palace

Ref Magna Carta 30-09-2017

My Lord Archbishop
I am enclosing a write up on Magna Carta and its importance in English Law. At the end are some questions to which I would like answers.

Myths surrounding Magna Carta 1215 and subsequent re-issues

The reason for Magna Carta 1215.
King John was a bad King he had upset the Barons by forcing their wives and daughters into his bed against their will, because they were being raped they were not co-operative so the following day John would walk into court and announce that Baron so an so’s wife was a terrible lay. As a result the Barons wanted him dead. King John was using foreign mercenaries to suppress the common man so the common man wanted him dead. As a result King John fearing for his life believed he could use a powerful ally, so he surrendered England to the Pope in May 1213, and he rented it back as a vassal King to the Pope. For 1000 marks a year. 700 marks for England 300 marks for Ireland. Two years later in June 1215 John was forced to meet the Barons at Runnymede, that meeting was attended by thousands of the freemen of England determined to Kill John if he did not agree to rule us according to our Ancient laws. Archbishop Langton had found a copy of the Charter of Liberties 1100 a re-issue of English law by King Henry I which he showed to the Barons who said it was good law and it was re-issued as Magna Carta 1215. So Magna Carta was not new law, it was simply a re-issue of our existing ancient law. At Runnymede John was forced to agree to rule us according to our law by the estates of England, England’s highest law giving body with authority to fire and hire Kings which they did when they fired James II and hired William and Mary in January/ February 1689.

Henry III
The Pope ordered John to renege on Magna Carta starting the Barons war against John. John Died in 1216 and Henry III a nine year old came to the throne, as soon as he became of age he wrote to the Pope stating he Henry answered to God for all things ecclesiastical and to the people of England for everything else and he stopped the payment to the Pope and reissued Magna Carta.

Edward I
King Edward I re-issued Magna Carta in October 1297 with his Confirmatio Cartarum this contained an order to all his Sheriffs, Justices, Mayors and other ministers that this must be published and read in every county after the feasts of St Michael, Christmas and the feast of St John. And every Cathedral must read it out twice a year. King Edward I ruled that any decisions taken in court which contravened Magna Carta was null and void, and that all Archbishops and Bishops shall excommunicate any person who breaks or attempts to break any part of Magna Carta

Edward III
The Pope wrote to Edward III demanding the unpaid monies he claimed were owed him under the agreement with King John. Edward spoke to the Bishops and the Barons they asked for time to seek the opinion of the commonality of England and a meeting of the estates of England took place in May 1366 after which Edward III was told England did not belong to King John he only held it in trust for those who follow on, it was not his to give away King John broke the law and King Edward was not to pay the money. Edward we are told by Sir Mathew Hale CJ wrote roundly to the Pope.

Charles I

King Charles I refused to re-issue Magna Carta because like all the Stuart Kings he believed wrongly that he ruled by divine right. As a result he lost his head. James II lost his Kingdom but kept his head. After a meeting of the estates of England.

A number of academics have postulated over the years that Magna Carta was bad for any number of reasons it is not the law of England or that it is and always has been unimportant. These academics are quite frankly wrong, Magna Carta is simply a re-issue of ancient English Law, it is the legal document which protects our rights and freedoms restating the restrictions we place upon our Kings to guarantee our ancient freedoms, The Declaration of Rights and the Bill of Rights 1689 simply reiterate those restrictions which have always been placed upon our Kings since Alfred the Great gave us his legal codes in 886 and can be considered a re-issue of Magna Carta. It was Alfred who guaranteed our rights and freedoms. Which have in the last 1136 years become the custom and practice of England. And as such are beyond the reach of Parliament which falsely claims sovereignty contrary to the 1351 Treason Act. On the 8th March 1784 Parliament debated the question of Sovereignty and Parliament decided in the only legal way they could that ultimate and total Sovereignty lies with the Lawfully Anointed King.
(1) In compliance with the statute of Confirmatio Cartarum 1297 which has not been repealed is Magna Carta read out twice a year in every Cathedral?
(2) If it is not why is the Church of England in breach of the law?
(3) What action do you propose to take to ensure the above statute is complied with?
(3) When will the benefit of the Church of England be withdrawn if necessary posthumously by excommunication in compliance with the law by those who repealed sixty of the sixty three articles. ?
Respectfully submitted

Albert Burgess
Politics - Things you should know / Live stream with Katie Hopkins
« Last post by the leveller on July 28, 2020, 07:08:24 PM »
Mon 20/07/2020 20:55

Livestream with Katie Hopkins
and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.
Posted By: Rodney Atkinsonon: July 09, 2020In: News Print Email
White, far left instigators of racial tensions and street violence in supposed defence of blacks will not admit that it is precisely those they attack (the white Anglo Saxon capitalist world) which has for 200 years been in the vanguard of slavery abolition, legal protection of workers, freedom of contract and social welfare while today slavery is almost exclusively the province of Chinese and North Korean communists, Asian factories (even in Britain) and African countries where labour exploitation, forced labour and slave selling is rife.

The British Empire abolished the slave trade in 1807 and slavery in 1833. The USA abolished slavery in 1865. The modern slave (as in the Leicester clothes factory run by Asians – just revealed in the British press) is paid illegal poverty wages and expected to survive economically in society. The old slaves could of course be bought and sold – but they were fed and accommodated by the owner. So today’s slavery is even worse than the kind which was abolished (at least in the Anglo Saxon world) in the 19th century!

According to the Global Slavery Index:

on any given day in 2016 there were over 3.8 million people living in conditions of modern

slavery in China. This estimate does not include figures on organ trafficking.

Among the many manufacturing industries in China …. it was revealed that employees of Chinese electronics manufacturing giant Foxconn, which produced parts for Apple’s iPhone, were allegedly subjected to exploitative working conditions.

Students from vocational courses are reportedly forced to work in the electronics manufacturing sector under the threat of failing to graduate if they decline. These jobs are disguised as “internships” but are usually simple production line jobs. Such cases of forced labour have been documented in electronics factories supplying major brands such as Apple, Acer, HP, and Sony, among many others.

Of the 183 countries assessed, only 31 have ratified the International Labour Office’s 2014 Forced Labour Protocol. Forty-seven countries have not criminalised human trafficking in accordance with the definitions outlined in the UN Trafficking Protocol; a further 96 countries have not criminalised forced labour, and 133 have not criminalised forced marriage

The Global Slavery Index lists the 10 countries taking the least action to respond to modern slavery:

1. North Korea

2. Eritrea

3. Libya

4. Iran

5. Equatorial Guinea

6. Burundi

7. Democratic Republic of the Congo

8. Congo

9. Russia

10. Somalia

The 10 countries taking the most action against modern slavery.

1. The United Kingdom

2. The Netherlands

3. The United States

4. Portugal

5. Sweden

6. Argentina

7. Belgium

8. Spain

9. Croatia

10. Australia


Some of the worst examples of slavery are in Libya where the International Organisation for Migration says that it had documented reports of “slave markets” along the migrant routes in North Africa “tormenting hundreds of young African men bound for Libya. There they become commodities to be bought, sold and discarded when they have no more value,” said a spokesman. . A video (CNN) showing a slave auction where men are sold for $400:

““Does anybody need a digger? This is a digger, a big strong man, he’ll dig,” said an auctioneer, according to CNN. “What am I bid, what am I bid?”

Thanks to the grotesque policies of Merkel’s Germany and Sweden these poor Africans were led to believe they could go to Europe but were then trapped as slave fodder in Libya. Well done Angela Merkel!


But while Middle east and African countries do nothing about slavery the British and Americans lead the world in fighting slavery – not what the mass media with their BLM/ANTIFA obsessions want to reveal!  8 of the ten worst countries for slavery are in Africa. All the 10 countries doing the most to fight slavery are white.

A former Royal Navy officer of 22 years standing wrote on an MP’s website recently:

Many of my patrols, based in the Arabian Gulf and Indian Ocean, focused on drug running, enforcing the oil embargo as well as other peace keeping duties. One of the tasks we performed that I never expected to, was countering the traffic in human cargo. Yes, modern day slavery. We would encounter slave traders operating between Yemen, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Somalia, North Africa and other places. Occasionally the slavers would attempt to flee by shooting the slaves and pushing them overboard thereby forcing us to stop and pick them up. Fortunately our Royal Marines were better shots and they rarely got away. Modern day slavery exists. We are one of the few countries doing something about it.

It is all the more disgraceful that there is Slavery in the UK. It is the habit of immigrant employers of other immigrants (often illegals who dare not complain). In Leicester clothing labourers have been employed at between £3 and £4 an hour (legal minimum for over 25s is £9) and were kept working throughout the COVID19 lockdown. This became generally known in June but in January Andrew Bridgen (the MP for North West Leicestershire) asked a Business Energy & Industrial Strategy minister;

“Will the Minister agree to meet me to discuss the situation in Leicester, where I believe that approximately 10,000 people in the clothing industry are being paid £3 to £4 an hour in conditions of modern slavery?”

Doubtless – as in the sex gangs cases – political racial correctness prevented a rigorous investigation so now that illegality has been compounded by the resurgence of COVID19 in Leicester – the close working in such factories being classic Coronavirus sources.


The Slave Trade Act 1807 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom prohibiting the slave trade in the British Empire and in 1833 slavery itself was abolished by Act of Parliament. As the journalist Kathy Gyngell noted, it was in 1792 that William Pitt urged the abolition of this ‘abominable trade’. 

The abolition of slaves in the British Empire logically led (as it had not in the USA) to the compensating of slave owners who had, before the Act came into force, been engaged in a legitimate trade. Praise for the British laws came from all over the civilised world. John Philpot Curran an Irish Nationalist wrote:

“No matter with what solemnities he may have been devoted upon the altar of slavery the moment he touches the sacred soil of Britain the altar and the God sink together into the dust and he stands redeemed regenerated and disenththralled by the irresistible genius of universal emancipation”

In America Harriet Beecher Stow describing in “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” the escape to Canada of American slaves wrote:

“Hours fleeted and at last clear and full rose the blessed English shores charmed by a mighty spell with one touch to dissolve every incantation of slavery”

We British have much to be proud of in the history of the abolition of slavery – and our continued fight against it today. No far left, violent exploiters of racial tensions (now so roundly condemned by Blacks on both sides of the Atlantic) dare look at the facts.


It was a supreme irony that while the Wells Fargo Bank (along with 269 other multinationals) signed up to support the extremist BLM, that organisation’s supporters were destroying one of the bank’s properties! Of course – BLM hates Jews, capitalism and wishes to defund the police. No wonder no one was around to protect Wells Fargo!

Tags:AfricaAngela MerkelAnglo Saxon worldAsian factoriesBLMChinaGlobal Slavery IndexHarriet Beecher StowInternational Labour OfficeRoyal NavySlave traders Libyaslavery abolitionWells Fargo

Rodney Atkinson
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk